Abstract:Gender bias continues to be a concern in many work settings, leading researchers to identify factors that influence workplace decisions. In this study we examine several of these factors, using an organizing framework of sex distribution within jobs (including male- and female-dominated jobs as well as sex-balanced, or integrated, jobs). We conducted random effects meta-analyses including 136 independent effect sizes from experimental studies (N = 22,348) and examined the effects of decision-maker gender, amount and content of information available to the decision maker, type of evaluation, and motivation to make careful decisions on gender bias in organizational decisions. We also examined study characteristics such as type of participant, publication year, and study design. Our findings revealed that men were preferred for male-dominated jobs (i.e., gender-role congruity bias), whereas no strong preference for either gender was found for female-dominated or integrated jobs. Second, male raters exhibited greater gender-role congruity bias than did female raters for male-dominated jobs. Third, gender-role congruity bias did not consistently decrease when decision makers were provided with additional information about those they were rating, but gender-role congruity bias was reduced when information clearly indicated high competence of those being evaluated. Fourth, gender-role congruity bias did not differ between decisions that required comparisons among ratees and decisions made about individual ratees. Fifth, decision makers who were motivated to make careful decisions tended to exhibit less gender-role congruity bias for male-dominated jobs. Finally, for male-dominated jobs, experienced professionals showed smaller gender-role congruity bias than did undergraduates or working adults.

Role of Gender in the Evaluation of Security Decisions

Impact of Gender on the Evaluation of Security Decisions

Empowering Women to Lead Cybersecurity: The Effect of Female Executives on Disclosure Sentiment

Gender of Recruiter Makes a Difference: A study into Cybersecurity Graduate Recruitment

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

"Un-Equal Online Safety?" A Gender Analysis of Security and Privacy Protection Advice and Behaviour Patterns

Women reporters as experts on security affairs in Jordan? Rethinking gender and issue competency stereotypes

Dangers of succumbing to bias in cyber security : An evaluation of the impact of cognitive biases on threat assessments and cyber security strategies

Individual and Contextual Variables of Cyber Security Behaviour -- An empirical analysis of national culture, industry, organisation, and individual variables of (in)secure human behaviour

The Gender Gap in Fear: Assessing the Interactive Effects of Gender and Perceived Risk on Fear of Crime

Ethical principles shaping values-based cybersecurity decision-making

Gender Bias in Big Data Analysis

Cybersecurity compliance behavior: Exploring the influences of individual decision style and other antecedents

Societal gender inequality and the gender gap in safety perceptions: Comparative evidence from the International Crime Victims Survey

The Effect of Security Education and Expertise on Security Assessments: the Case of Software Vulnerabilities

Determinants of gender differences in household food security perceptions in the Western and Eastern regions of Kenya

Identifying the Prevalence of Gender Biases among the Computing Organizations

Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?

Women's Role Repositioning in Security Sector

Exploring gender biases in ML and AI academic research through systematic literature review

Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics