Abstract:We synthesized the vast, contradictory scholarly literature on gender bias in academic science from 2000 to 2020. In the most prestigious journals and media outlets, which influence many people’s opinions about sexism, bias is frequently portrayed as an omnipresent factor limiting women’s progress in the tenure-track academy. Claims and counterclaims regarding the presence or absence of sexism span a range of evaluation contexts. Our approach relied on a combination of meta-analysis and analytic dissection. We evaluated the empirical evidence for gender bias in six key contexts in the tenure-track academy: (a) tenure-track hiring, (b) grant funding, (c) teaching ratings, (d) journal acceptances, (e) salaries, and (f) recommendation letters. We also explored the gender gap in a seventh area, journal productivity, because it can moderate bias in other contexts. We focused on these specific domains, in which sexism has most often been alleged to be pervasive, because they represent important types of evaluation, and the extensive research corpus within these domains provides sufficient quantitative data for comprehensive analysis. Contrary to the omnipresent claims of sexism in these domains appearing in top journals and the media, our findings show that tenure-track women are at parity with tenure-track men in three domains (grant funding, journal acceptances, and recommendation letters) and are advantaged over men in a fourth domain (hiring). For teaching ratings and salaries, we found evidence of bias against women; although gender gaps in salary were much smaller than often claimed, they were nevertheless concerning. Even in the four domains in which we failed to find evidence of sexism disadvantaging women, we nevertheless acknowledge that broad societal structural factors may still impede women’s advancement in academic science. Given the substantial resources directed toward reducing gender bias in academic science, it is imperative to develop a clear understanding of when and where such efforts are justified and of how resources can best be directed to mitigate sexism when and where it exists.

Identifying the Prevalence of Gender Biases among the Computing Organizations

Dynamics of Gender Bias in Computing

Implicit Gender Bias in Computer Science -- A Qualitative Study

Dynamics of Gender Bias within Computer Science

Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting

Gender Bias in Big Data Analysis

Eliminating Gender Bias in Computer Science Education Materials

Perceptions of Gender Diversity's impact on mood in software development teams

Code Reviews in Open Source Projects : How Do Gender Biases Affect Participation and Outcomes?

How Gender-Biased Tools Shape Newcomer Experiences in OSS Projects

Diversity in Software Engineering: A Survey about Scientists from Underrepresented Groups

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Breaking Barriers: Investigating the Sense of Belonging Among Women and Non-Binary Students in Software Engineering

Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration

Exploring teachers’ and students’ gender role bias and students’ confidence in STEM fields

Gender Diversity in Computer Science at a Large Research University

Temporal Analysis and Gender Bias in Computing

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Diversity dilemmas: uncovering gender and nationality biases in graduate admissions across top North American computer science programs

Using a Virtual Workplace Environment to Reduce Implicit Gender Bias