Abstract:Comment.5: The author should describe the results precisely. Answer5: We wish to thank the reviewer#2 for helpful comments which definitel y help improve our manuscript. We have revised the Result in Abstract of manuscript according to the reviewer#2. And Above describing the results precise ly. have been incorporated in the Abstact section of the revised version of the manusc ript(done highlight). Introduction Comment. 6: The Introduction is too short. The authors discuss various issues in only seven lines giving 2 references published in 2002 and 1999. So adding few paragraphs as well as adding at least a number of other, up to date referenc es to support their theses would be of great value. Answer.6: We wish to thank the reviewer#2 for helpful comments and advice which definitely help improve our manuscript. We have revised Introduction se ction of revised version of manuscript according to the comments raised by the reviewer# 2. And we have added some new references in recent 5 years to support background of our research(done highlight section). And the corresponding reference has been incorporated in Introduction and References section of revised versi on of the manuscript.(done highlight section). Methods Comment.7:The terminology and the methods used should be clarified, e.g.Which study design does this survey represent? I would not say it is a“retrospecti ve cohort study”. Answer.7: We wish to thank the reviewer#2 for helpful comments and advice which definitely help improve our manuscript. And we are sorry that our descriptions on carrying out retrospective observational study were not sufficiently cle ar. And we have modified the MATERIALS AND METHODS, Study design as follows: Since 1988, a database of Health-care workers(HCWs) with the annual examination had been built up for health observation in the future. Those Health-care w ork rs who were entered the database were asked to sign a written informed consent for future research and analysis. All data were entered into a computerized database and were analyzed anonymously. The HCWs enrolled in the present study were f rom this database. The research protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Com mittee of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University. Retrospective study of HCWs vaccinated against hepatitis B fr om 1988 to 2008. The study was conducted in the Public General Hospital, that is to say, is a teaching hospital in Southern China: The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-s an University, a representative General Hospital. Above the modified METHODS(Study design paragraph) have been incorpor ated in MATERIALS AND METHODS of the revised version of the manuscri pt.(done

Response to "A correspondence on bibliometric analysis of vaccination against atherosclerosis"

A correspondence on bibliometric analysis of vaccination against atherosclerosis

Comment on "Bibliometric analysis of dendritic cell-based vaccines over the past 15 years"

A bibliometric analysis of vaccination against atherosclerosis

Response to "knowledge mapping of immunotherapy for breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022: A correspondence"

Corrigendum: Impact of Serum Uric Acid Lowering and Contemporary Uric Acid-Lowering Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Authors Reply:

Letter to the editor to 'Clinical characteristics and risk factors for ZF2001 fully vaccinated inpatients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study'

Rejoinder to Professor Ho’s Team on the Article Entitled ‘on Evolutionary Economic Geography: a Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis’

Corrigendum: A Comparison of COVID-19 Stigma and AIDS Stigma During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in China

Reply To: "Reporting Of All Cardiac Medications And Their Outcome In Covid-19"

A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al

Reply to Delanghe et al, Boudin et al, and Focosi et al

Reply to Collins et al

Response to "Comments on 'Zhang et al: Clinical trial analysis of 2019-nCoV therapy registered in China'"

Bibliometric analysis of immunotherapy for bladder cancer: A correspondence

Author Correction: Mapping Global Acceptance and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccination: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Author's Reply to Comment on Psoriasis/Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A time to solve the liaison.

Author's response to reviews Title:Health care workers in southern China are not vaccinated adequately against hepatitis B: a retrospective cohort study. Authors:

Author Response for "stance in Article Highlights: the Promotion of Covid‐19 Research"

Reply to the Comments on "Biomarkers and Related Factors for the Diagnosis, Risk of Coronary Artery Lesions, and Resistance to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Kawasaki Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses"