Abstract:To verify the effectiveness and safety of the novel "Ibot" hip joint arthroplasty robot system, we designed this multicenter randomized controlled trial. More precise acetabular prosthesis positioning and no significant difference in safety outcomes is found in the application of this novel robot system when compared with conventional THA. Objective Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is currently one of the most effective treatment methods for end‐stage hip joint disease, and its long‐term effectiveness largely depends on the accurate placement of the acetabular prosthesis. In conventional surgery, the placement of the acetabular prosthesis mainly relies on the surgeon's clinical experience and surgical techniques. To further improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement, a new robotic system for THA is designed. The purpose of this study is to verify the effectiveness and safety of THA assisted by this robotic system. Method A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, superiority study design was adopted with statistical methods of t test and Chi‐squared test. Participants undergoing primary THA have been enrolled in three centers of joint surgery in China since July 17, 2023. Robotic THA was operated in the experimental group, and conventional instruments were used in the control group. The primary outcome is the proportion of anteversion and inclination angles in the safe zone. The secondary outcomes include operation time, WOMAC score, Harris score, SF‐36 health questionnaire, dislocation rate of hip joint, and rates of adverse events and serious adverse events. Results A total of 138 patients were included in this study. The proportion of both anteversion and inclination angles in the safe zone was 92.2% in the experimental group and 50.8% in the control group, with significant difference (p 0.05). The dislocation rate of hip joint in the experimental group and control group were 3.0% and 1.5%, respectively, without significant difference (p > 0.05). The rate of adverse events and severe adverse events in the experimental group and control group also showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). No adverse events or serious adverse events were judged to be "definitely related" to the experimental instruments. Conclusion Robotic THA could prolong the operation time within an acceptable range, but more precise acetabular prosthesis positioning could be obtained when compared with conventional surgery. Besides, no significant difference was found in function scores, dislocation rate or other adverse events, which indicates that this new robot system shows both good effectiveness and safety in THA. Trial Registration Clinical Trials: NCT05947734

The efficacy of "TiRobot"orthopaedic robot-assisted VS conventional fluoroscopic percutaneous screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint

Comparison of Outcomes Following TiRobot-Assisted Sacroiliac Screw Fixation with Bone Grafting and Traditional Screw Fixation without Bone Grafting for Unstable Osteoporotic Sacral Fracture: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 33 Patients

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique

Improved Accuracy of Cervical Spinal Surgery with Robot-Assisted Screw Insertion: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Robot-assisted vs traditional percutaneous freehand for the scaphoid fracture treatment: a retrospective study

Comparison of accuracy and safety between second-generation TiRobot-assisted and free-hand thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement

Development and Clinical Trial of a New Orthopedic Surgical Robot for Positioning and Navigation

Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery

Early postoperative efficacy of a fully automated orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis

Finite Element Analysis of Sacral-Alar-iliac Screw Fixation for Sacroiliac Joint Dislocation.

Robot-assisted versus traditional surgery in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis

Multimodal Neuroelectrophysiological Monitoring Combined with Robot-Assisted Placement of a Transiliac-Transsacral Screw for the Treatment of Transforaminal Sacral Fractures

The Application of DSA Rotary Reconstruction Technique in Percutaneous Iliosacral Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Fracture and Dislocation

Precise Acetabular Prosthesis Positioning Using a Novel Robot‐Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty System: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical outcome analysis of robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis complicated with spinal fractures

TiRobot‐Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Elderly Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Retrospective Study

ACCURACY AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF SPINAL IMPLANTS ASSISTED BY THE ROBOTIC SPINAL SURGERY SYSTEM: ANIMAL STUDY

A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques

Comparison of robot versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A retrospective study

The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease

Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis