Abstract:The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin–Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method ( P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy ( P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch ( P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA ( P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P < 0.001), short pedicle width ( P < 0.001), and short pedicle height ( P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Comparing Robot-Assisted Technology and the Free-Hand with Fluoroscopy-Guided Method in Spine Surgery

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods

Effectiveness and Safety of Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Assisted Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement in Posterior Cervical Surgery

A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques

Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion versus navigation-based and freehand techniques for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of robot-assisted spine surgeries on clinical outcomes: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Robotic spine systems: overcoming surgeon experience in pedicle screw accuracy: a prospective study

Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Is robot-assisted pedicle screw placement really superior to conventional surgery? An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Robot‐assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery – a systematic review and a meta‐analysis of comparative studies

Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Cohort Study

Comparison of the Accuracy Between Robot-Assisted and Conventional Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: a preliminary clinical report

Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery

A prospective cohort study of the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive spinal surgery

Comparison of robot versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A retrospective study

Radiological and Clinical Differences Between Tinavi Orthopedic Robot and O-Arm Navigation System in Thoracolumbar Screw Implantation for Reconstruction of Spinal Stability.

Safety and Accuracy of Cannulated Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: a Comparison of Robotic-Navigation, O-arm-based Navigation, and Freehand Techniques