Abstract:Background: Letters of recommendation (LOR) are considered by program directors (PDs) to be an integral part of the residency application. With the conversion of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a binary pass/fail outcome, LORs will likely have higher important in the application process moving forward. However, their utility in securing an interview for a particular applicant remains undetermined. This study aims to identify the applicant and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation. Methods: Letter writer (n = 977) characteristics were abstracted from applications (n = 264) to an individual integrated vascular surgery residency program over 2 application cycles. A validated text analysis program, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, was used to characterize LOR content. Applicant, letter writer, and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation were determined using multivariable analysis. Results: Letter writers were 70.9% vascular surgeons (VS), 23.7% PDs, and 45.4% professors. Applicants offered an interview were more likely to come from a top 50 medical school (35.2% vs 25.8%, P = 0.013) and an institution with a home vascular program (45.5% vs 34.1%, P = 0.006). Alpha Omega Alpha membership was significantly associated with interview offer (28.4%, P < 0.001). A greater proportion of letters from VS was associated with an interview offer (P < 0.001) compared with letter writers of other specialties. One or more PD letters were significantly associated with an interview offer (79.55% vs 20.45%, P = 0.008), whereas number of letters from APDs was not significantly associated with interview offer. Letters written by away institution faculty were significantly associated with interview offer (75%, P < 0.001), whereas nonclinical letters were not. Presence of one or more letters from a chair (57.95% vs 42.05%, P = 0.015) or chief (67.05% vs 32.95%, P = 0.028) was significantly associated with interview offer. Letters for applicants offered an interview had more references to research and teaching, which were more common in letters written by versus Letters written by PDs were more likely to use assertive, advertising language in favor of applicants. There were no significant applicant, letter writer, or LOR characteristics associated with a top 20 rank. Conclusions: Successful applicants were more likely to have LORs written by VS, PDs, and those of higher academic rank with references to research and teaching.

Evaluating the Impact of the Standardized Letter of Recommendation on a Successful Match in Urology Residency

Evaluating the 2023 Standardized Letter of Recommendation Form in Applications to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency

Exploring Recent Changes to the New Urology Residency Match

Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation: Relevance to Urology Match Outcomes and Pursuit of Fellowship Training/Academic Career

Updated Research Publication Standards and Expectations for Successful Matching in Urology Residency Following Step 1 Scoring Changes

Effect of USMLE Score Cutoffs on Recruitment of Underrepresented Applicants in the Urology Match

Letter of Recommendation Characteristics Associated with Interview Offer to a Vascular Surgery Residency Program

Predictors of Excellent Urology Residents at the Time of the Urology Match

How Prominent Is Score Inflation, Gender, and Racial Bias in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review

The content and value of letters of recommendation in the resident candidate evaluative process

Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants

Dear Program Director: An Evaluation of Implicit Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Neurosurgery Residency

Characteristics Associated with Successful Residency Match in General Surgery

Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail

Evaluating PubMed-Indexed Publications of Applicants Successfully Matching into the Top 50 Urology Residency Programs in the 2021-2023 Cycles

Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis

The Law of Diminishing Returns in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match: A Deeper Look at the Numbers

Urology Residency Applicant Selection: Program Directors' New Criteria

Letters of Reference in the Current Era

Machine Learning for Predictive Analysis of Otolaryngology Residency Letters of Recommendation

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review