Abstract:Background The literature describes more than ten upper extremity physical performance tests that are characterized by being low-cost, quick, and easy to administer. However, there are discussions about the applicability of the tests in clinical practice due to their inability to reproduce the sports-specific movement and the lack of reference values. Objectives To evaluate the opinion of Brazilian sports physiotherapists regarding the frequency, timing, and difficulties in using upper extremity physical performance tests in clinical practice, as well as to investigate which of the tests available in the literature are being used more or less frequently. Methods The study design was cross-sectional. Physiotherapists working in the orthopedic or sports field were invited to fill out an online questionnaire. The frequency question was multiple choice, allowing participants to select one of five options ranging from never to always. The timing question was multiple choice, allowing participants to select all three options: assessment, rehabilitation, and return to sport. The question about difficulties was multiple choice, allowing participants to click on only one of the following options: “yes”, “a little”, or “no”. The first two options directed the participant to an optional open question to report the difficulties. As for the question regarding which test, they use, the names and figures of each of the ten tests were presented, and the participants answered whether or not they used them. The present study included the participation of physiotherapists who treated at least 1% of athletes per month, but for this abstract, the responses of physiotherapists for whom athlete treatment represented 50% or more of the services rendered per month were analyzed descriptively. Results The answers of one hundred sports physiotherapists were analyzed, the majority of whom were male (67%), worked in the state of São Paulo (32%), and had an average age of 33 years with 8 years of experience in the physiotherapy area. The physiotherapists answered that they frequently use the tests (37%), mainly for assessment purposes (85%), and the majority reported not having difficulty applying the tests (57%). The physiotherapists who reported having difficulty pointed out the lack of reference values, adequate space, evaluation time, and knowledge about the tests as a challenge in clinical practice, as well as the inability to reproduce the sports-specific movement and the lack of adaptation to different body types. The most commonly used test was the “Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test” (CKCUEST) (86%), while the least used was the “Upper Body Push and Pull Strength Ratio” (23%). Conclusion In conclusion, physiotherapists whose treatment of athletes represented 50% or more of the treatments per month, despite reporting some difficulties, frequently use upper extremity physical performance tests, mainly the CKCUEST, to evaluate their athletes. Implications This abstract showed that physiotherapists who treat athletes are aware of and use upper extremity physical performance tests, but some encounter difficulties in implementing them in clinical practice. Therefore, further research in this area may provide reference values for the Brazilian population.

NORMATIVE VALUES FOR ISOMETRIC MUSCLE STRENGTH OF HIP FLEXORS WITH HAND-HELD DYNAMOMETER IN UNIVERSITY ATHLETES

Field Hip Stability Isometric Test (F-HipSIT): Reliability of Assessing the Hip Posterolateral Muscle Strength in Sports Settings

Normative Hamstrings and Quadriceps Isometric Strength Values and Hamstrings-Quadriceps Asymmetry in Healthy Collegiate Soccer and Basketball Players

Reliability of lower limb strength assessment in female team sport athletes

Reliability and Validity of a Portable Traction Dynamometer in Knee-Strength Extension Tests: An Isometric Strength Assessment in Recreationally Active Men

Validity and reliability of a low-cost dynamometer to assess maximal isometric strength of upper limb

Hip- and knee-strength assessments using a hand-held dynamometer with external belt-fixation are inter-tester reliable

Validity and reliability of a low-cost digital dynamometer for measuring isometric strength of lower limb

The Myometric Assessment of Achilles Tendon and Soleus Muscle Stiffness before and after a Standardized Exercise Test in Elite Female Volleyball and Handball Athletes—A Quasi-Experimental Study

Absolute and Normalized Normative Torque Values of Knee Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Trained Subjects: Asymmetry Questions the Classical Use of Uninjured Limb as Reference

Validity and Reliability of Handheld Dynamometry to Assess Isometric Hamstrings and Quadriceps Strength at Varying Muscle Lengths

Intrarater Test-Retest Reliability of Hip Abduction, Internal Rotation, and External Rotation Strength Measurements in a Healthy Cohort Using a Handheld Dynamometer and a Portable Stabilization Device: A Pilot Study

Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength

A review of the reliability of biomechanical variables produced during the isometric mid-thigh pull and isometric squat and the reporting of normative data

Changes in Hip Isometric Strength of Female College Soccer Players After High-Workload Training Session

The dynamic strength index is a reliable and feasible tool to assess neuromuscular performance in male and female handball players

Reliability of Dynamic Shoulder Strength Test Battery Using Multi-Joint Isokinetic Device

ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL TESTS PERFORMANCE AND LOWER LIMB STRENGTH

Assessing quadriceps strength in patellofemoral pain patients: A study on the reliability and validity of a low-cost strain-gauge for clinical practice

OPINIONS OF BRAZILIAN SPORTS PHYSIOTHERAPISTS ON UPPER EXTREMITY PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS

Normative data for the squat, bench press and deadlift exercises in powerlifting: Data from 809,986 competition entries