Abstract:A considerable literature on attribution theory has shown that healthy individuals exhibit a positivity bias when inferring the causes of evaluative feedback on their performance. They tend to attribute positive feedback internally (e.g., to their own abilities) but negative feedback externally (e.g., to environmental factors). However, all empirical demonstrations of this bias suffer from at least one of the three following drawbacks: First, participants directly judge explicit causes for their performance. Second, participants have to imagine events instead of experiencing them. Third, participants assess their performance only after receiving feedback and thus differences in baseline assessments cannot be excluded. It is therefore unclear whether the classically reported positivity bias generalizes to setups without these drawbacks. Here, we aimed at establishing the relevance of attributions for decision-making by showing an attribution-related positivity bias in a decision-making task. We developed a novel task, which allowed us to test how participants changed their evaluations in response to positive and negative feedback about performance. Specifically, we used videos of actors expressing different facial emotional expressions. Participants were first asked to evaluate the actors' credibility in expressing a particular emotion. After this initial rating, participants performed an emotion recognition task and did--or did not--receive feedback on their veridical performance. Finally, participants re-rated the actors' credibility, which provided a measure of how they changed their evaluations after feedback. Attribution theory predicts that participants change their evaluations of the actors' credibility toward the positive after receiving positive performance feedback and toward the negative after negative performance feedback. Our results were in line with this prediction. A control condition without feedback showed that correct or incorrect performance alone could not explain the observed positivity bias. Furthermore, participants' behavior in our task was linked to the most widely used measure of attribution style. In sum, our findings suggest that positive and negative performance feedback influences the evaluation of task-related stimuli, as predicted by attribution theory. Therefore, our study points to the relevance of attribution theory for feedback processing in decision-making and provides a novel outlook for decision-making biases.

Effects of performance feedback on users' evaluations of an interactive IR system

Feedback Effect in User Interaction with Intelligent Assistants: Delayed Engagement, Adaption and Drop-out

The Influence of Presentation and Performance on User Satisfaction

The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

An Evaluation of Real-Time Feedback for Training Classroom Observers

Brain Responses in Evaluating Feedback Stimuli with a Social Dimension.

Soliciting Human-in-the-Loop User Feedback for Interactive Machine Learning Reduces User Trust and Impressions of Model Accuracy

State-Aware Meta-Evaluation of Evaluation Metrics in Interactive Information Retrieval

The Effects of Real-Time Feedback on Effort and Performance: Evidence from a Natural Quasi-Experiment

Unveiling the impacts of performance-contingent incentivized reviews on subsequent supplementary reviews

The Impact of Emotional Feedback and Elaborated Feedback of a Pedagogical Agent on Multimedia Learning

Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance

Differential Effects of Instructor Feedback and Computerized Feedback in Online Learning.

The Illusion of Performance: The Effect of Phantom Display Refresh Rates on User Expectations and Reaction Times

Evaluating the Temporal Location of Feedback: Providing Feedback Following Performance vs. Prior to Performance

Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory

Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback

Robot Assistants for Perimetry: A Study of Patient Experience and Performance

A Systematic Review: What Are the Impacts of Receiving Extrinsic Feedback on Health Professions Students in Higher Education?

Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs

How to Provide Feedback? the Role of Robot’s Language and Feedback Framework