Abstract:Procedures relying on infinitesimals in Leibniz, Euler and Cauchy have been interpreted in both a Weierstrassian and Robinson's frameworks. The latter provides closer proxies for the procedures of the classical masters. Thus, Leibniz's distinction between assignable and inassignable numbers finds a proxy in the distinction between standard and nonstandard numbers in Robinson's framework, while Leibniz's law of homogeneity with the implied notion of equality up to negligible terms finds a mathematical formalisation in terms of standard part. It is hard to provide parallel formalisations in a Weierstrassian framework but scholars since Ishiguro have engaged in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers to provide a Weierstrassian account for Leibniz's infinitesimals. Euler similarly had notions of equality up to negligible terms, of which he distinguished two types: geometric and arithmetic. Euler routinely used product decompositions into a specific infinite number of factors, and used the binomial formula with an infinite exponent. Such procedures have immediate hyperfinite analogues in Robinson's framework, while in a Weierstrassian framework they can only be reinterpreted by means of paraphrases departing significantly from Euler's own presentation. Cauchy gives lucid definitions of continuity in terms of infinitesimals that find ready formalisations in Robinson's framework but scholars working in a Weierstrassian framework bend over backwards either to claim that Cauchy was vague or to engage in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers in his work. Cauchy's procedures in the context of his 1853 sum theorem (for series of continuous functions) are more readily understood from the viewpoint of Robinson's framework, where one can exploit tools such as the pointwise definition of the concept of uniform convergence. Keywords: historiography; infinitesimal; Latin model; butterfly model

Leibniz's well-founded fictions and their interpretations

Leibniz vs Ishiguro: Closing a quarter-century of syncategoremania

Infinitesimals, Imaginaries, Ideals, and Fictions

Leibniz's Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, And Their Foes From Berkeley To Russell And Beyond

Interpreting the infinitesimal mathematics of Leibniz and Euler

Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers

Fermat Reals - Nilpotent Infinitesimals and Infinite Dimensional Spaces

When does a hyperbola meet its asymptote? Bounded infinities, fictions, and contradictions in Leibniz

Compossibility and Incompossibility in Leibniz

Leibniz on Time, Space, and Relativity

Fermat's dilemma: Why did he keep mum on infinitesimals? and the European theological context

Meaning in Classical Mathematics: Is it at Odds with Intuitionism?

A Leibniz/NSA comparison

Completeness of the Leibniz Field and Rigorousness of Infinitesimal Calculus

The Peculiar Destiny of Sentiment de Monsieur Leibnitz (May 1705 -- March 1706)

Tension between Intuitive Infinitesimals and Formal Mathematical Analysis

A Generalization of the Cantor-Dedekind Continuum with Nilpotent Infinitesimals

Leibniz Equivalence, Newton Equivalence, and Substantivalism

Rings, Holes and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras

Where Infinitesimals Come From ..

Commuting and noncommuting infinitesimals