Compossibility and Incompossibility in Leibniz

Aron Gurswitsch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1646-9_1
1975-01-01
Abstract:In a previous article we endeavored to deal with a paradox which seems to arise in Leibnizian philosophy.1 Substances or monads are conceived by Leibniz to be totally self-contained and self-sufficient: they cannot act upon one another nor receive any influence from without. Every monad is confined to living in its own states which, all of them, arise only and exclusively from its own grounds. On the other hand, the Leibnizian philosophy contains a great many statements concerning the totality of monads. Every monad represents the entire universe from its particular “point of view.” Hence the states and modifications of all monads or substances stand in the ideal relation of mutual correlation and correspondence. Between all substances and monads prevails the principle of the “universal harmony” which manifests itself in the just mentioned thoroughgoing correspondence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?