Abstract:Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remains challenging as no definitive surgical technique has emerged as the single best option in this varied patient population1-3. Although the available surgical techniques may differ substantially, they all share the same goals of achieving and maintaining deformity correction, allowing physiological spinal growth, and reducing the number of operations and complications. Herein, we present a modified self-growing rod technique that represents a valid alternative to the existing surgical procedures for EOS. Description: The patient is positioned prone on a radiolucent table, and the spine is prepared and draped in a standard fashion. A posterior midline skin incision is made from the upper to the lower instrumented level. Subperiosteal exposure of the spine is carried out, ensuring that capsules of the facet joints are spared. Pedicle screws are inserted bilaterally at the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation. Fixation with pedicle screws of at least 3 levels at the top and bottom end is usually advised; in nonambulatory patients with pelvic obliquity, caudal fixation can be extended to the pelvis with bilateral iliac screws. Sublaminar wires are positioned bilaterally at every level between the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation and are passed as medially as possible to avoid damage to the facet joints. Four 5-mm cobalt-chromium rods are cut, contoured, and inserted at each end of the construct. Ipsilateral rods are secured with use of sublaminar wires, making sure that they overlap over a sufficient length to allow for the remaining spinal growth. Correction of the deformity is achieved with use of a combination of cantilever maneuvers and apical translation by progressive and sequential tightening of the sublaminar wires. The wound is closed in layers over a subfascial drain. The patient is allowed free mobilization after surgery. No postoperative brace is required. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternative treatment for EOS includes serial cast immobilization and bracing4. Alternative surgical treatments include traditional growing rods5, magnetically controlled growing rods6, the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib-expansion technique7, and the Shilla technique8. The use of compression-based systems (i.e., staples or tether)9 or early limited fusion has also been reported by other authors. Rationale: The main advantage of our technique is that it relies on physiological spinal growth and does not require surgery or external devices for rod lengthening, which is particularly beneficial in frail patients with a neuromuscular disease in whom repeated surgery is not advised. Segmental fixation by sublaminar wires allows good control of the deformity apex during growth. Concerns regarding early fusion of the spine have not been confirmed in our mid-term follow-up study10. Expected outcomes: This technique allows correction of the deformity and continuous spinal growth in the years following surgery. At 6.0 years postoperatively, the average main curve correction was reported to be 61% and the average pelvic obliquity correction was 69%. The spine was reported to lengthen an average of 40.9 mm (range, 14.0 to 84.0 mm) immediately postoperatively, and the T1-S1 segment was reported to continue growing at 10.5 mm/year (range, 3.6 to 16.5 mm/year) thereafter10. The most common complication is rod breakage at the thoracolumbar junction, which seems to be more common in patients with idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS and during the pubertal growth spurt10. Important tips: Subperiosteal exposure of the spine should be carried out, making sure to preserve facet joints in the unfused area of the spine.Achieve segmental fixation with use of sublaminar wires at every level and pedicle screws at the top and bottom ends of the instrumentation.If pelvic imbalance is present and the patient is nonambulatory, pelvic fixation with iliac screws is advised.First round correction of the deformity is achieved with a cantilever technique; correction fine-tuning can be performed by tightening sublaminar wires.Consider utilizing thicker rods in cases of idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS. Acronyms and abbreviations: EOS = early-onset scoliosisAP = anteroposteriorEV = end vertebraSSEP = somatosensory evoked potentialsMEP = motor evoked potentialsPJK = proximal junctional kyphosisSMA = spinal muscular atrophyCP = cerebral palsyPACU = post-anesthesia care unit.

Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

Use of growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis with type 1 neurofibromatosis

Comparison of the Effects of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod and Tradiotinal Growing Rod Techniques on the Sagittal Plane in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis

Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Other Distraction-Based Surgical Technologies for Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years

Outcome of distraction-based growing rods at graduation: a comparison of traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods

Dual Growing Rods Combined With the Apical Convex Control Pedicle Screw Technique Versus Traditional Dual Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

Similar surgical outcomes of the growing rod technique for treatment of early-onset scoliosis with versus without untreated intraspinal anomalies

Contouring the magnetically controlled growing rods: impact on expansion capacity and proximal junctional kyphosis

Comparison of hybrid and traditional growing rod techniques in the treatment of early-onset congenital scoliosis

Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis—A Surgical Technique Video

A Modified Self-Growing Rod Technique for Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis

Comparison of the efficacy of the convex side short fusion combined with concave side single growing rod technique and the traditional bilateral growing rod technique in the treatment of early onset scoliosis

Outcomes of Traditional Dual Growing Rods With Apical Control Techniques for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: Comparison With Patients Treated With Traditional Dual Growing Rods Only With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Graduation

The Clinical and Imaging Outcome of the Tandem Growing Rod Technique in Early-Onset Scoliosis With the Proximal Upper Thoracic Curve Progression: A Modified Technique of Growing Rod

Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis

Outcome of Traditional Growing Rods for Correction of Apical Vertebra Rotation in Early-Onset Scoliosis

Outcome and Complications of Growing Rods for Correction of Hyperkyphotic Early-Onset Scoliosis

Growing Rods Are an Effective Fusionless Method of Controlling Early-Onset Scoliosis Associated With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series

Evolution of the postoperative sagittal spinal profile in early-onset scoliosis: is there a difference between rib-based and spine-based growth-friendly instrumentation?

A re-evaluation of the effects of dual growing rods on apical vertebral rotation in patients with early-onset scoliosis and a minimum of two lengthening procedures: a CT-based study.