Diurnal pattern of choline concentrations in serum of pigs as influenced by dietary choline or lecithin intake

S. Jakob,R. Mosenthin,G. Huesgen,J. Kinkeldei,K.-J. Poweleit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S003940050036

1998-12-01

Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Use of growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis with type 1 neurofibromatosis

李方财,张宁,陈维善,陈其昕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2017.06.05

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objectives:To investigate the surgical outcome and complications of growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis(EOS) with type 1 neurofibromatosis.Methods:Thirteen cases of EOS with type 1 neurofibromatosis treated with growing rods were studied retrospectively.There were 8 boys and 5 girls,aged from 5 to 10 years old(average,7.5±2.1 ys).The average follow-up was 5.1±2.8 years(2-10 years).Exptending procedure was carried out every 6 months after first time internal fixation.The Cobb angle,kyphosis angle and trunk height were measured,and the complications were also evaluated.Results:The mean Cobb angle was corrected from 69.0°±21.2°(43°-90°) preoperatively to 25.3°±15.0°(12°-45°) at the final follow-up,the correction rate was 63.3％.The trunk height was corrected from 323.0±29.1mm(288-355mm) to 400.5±25.7mm (361-430mm),and spine grew an average of 11.7±3.3mm per year.There were 16 complications in 9 cases (69.2％),with implant failures in 9 cases(56.3％),junctional kyphosis in 5 cases(31.3％),and wound dehiscence and deep wound infection in 1 case(6.2％).Among 9 cases with kyphosis angle less than 50°,complication was found in 6 cases (66.7％);among 4 cases with kyphosis angle more than 50°,complication was found in 3 cases (75％).There was no significant difference of complication rate between kyphosis more than 50° group and that less than 50°group(x2=0.123,P=-0.726).Conclusions:The use of growing rods in patients with EOS associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis provides curve correction and allows the growth of spine.Kyphosis more than 50° does not increase complications.
Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years

Alejandro Marquez-Lara,Daniel Bachman,Matthew Noble,Gordon Preston,Sarah Gilday,Stephanie Ihnow,Viral Jain,Peter F Sturm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00644-7

Abstract:Purpose: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as spinal curvature affecting children below 10 years of age. Non-operative treatment can consist of casting and bracing. When curvature progresses despite these treatments, operative intervention is indicated. Traditional growing rods (TGR) have been a mainstay of treatment. Unfortunately, TGR's require planned return to the operating room every 6-9 months. Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGR) ideally provide curve correction and allow the spine to grow without frequent surgeries. However, the ability to correct and maintain correction after MCGR has not been well-characterized. The purpose of this study is to evaluate maintenance of curve correction in patients treated primarily with MCGR and analyze the rate of complications including unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR). Methods: 24 patients with EOS were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were subdivided into 4 subcategories: congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular (NMS), and syndromic. The major curve correction (%) and T1-S1 distance were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and return to the operating room for any reason were recorded. Patients were followed until conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent lengthening of MCGR. Results: There were 11 male and 13 female patients averaging 8 years at the time of index surgery. The average preoperative curve angle was 61.1°. Initial curve correction with MCGR obtained at the index procedure was 46.2%, reducing the mean curve angle to 32.7° (p < 0.05). Curve correction at a mean 6.2 years (2.4-7.4) follow-up was 36.1°, 40.9% curve correction. 75% of patients underwent conversion to PSF during the study period 4.8 years (2.4-7.0) after initial MCGR surgery. 15% of patients were still undergoing MCGR lengthening after 6.1 years. 54.2% of patients had at least one UPROR. Conclusions: For patients with EOS with curve progression, MCGRs can maintain curve correction well after 2 years. Furthermore, MCGR allowed patients to grow over time to safely delay timing to definitive fusion. On average, patients underwent conversion to PSF after 4.7 years at an average age of 13.5. Although the complication rate in the first 2 years is relatively low, 54.2% of patients underwent an UPROR. As the use of MCGR increases, surgeons should be aware of possible complications associated with this technology and counsel patients accordingly. Further research is needed to continue to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MCGR in this challenging patient population.
Unmatched Rod Contouring at the Proximal End Predisposes to Occurrence of Junctional Kyphosis in Early-Onset Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Traditional Growing Rods Treatment

Yang Bo,Xu Liang,Wang Muyi,Wang Bin,Zhu Zezhang,Qiu Yong,Sun Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05564-7

IF: 2.562

2022-01-01

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Study design A retrospective case series. Objective To investigate whether unmatched rod contouring at the proximal end predisposed to the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients after traditional growing rods (TGR) treatment. Summary of background data TGR treatment has become a mainstay of treatment for EOS patients. PJK is one of the most common alignment-related complications. Methods A consecutive series of EOS patients who had undergone TGR treatment were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into PJK and non-PJK groups according to the occurrence of PJK or not. Demographic data, surgical strategies, and radiographic parameters were recorded and compared between groups. Proximal junctional angle (PJA) was defined as the angle between the caudal endplate of the UIV and the cephalad endplate of the second supradjacent vertebra above the UIV, while proximal rod contouring angle (PRCA) was defined as the angle of proximal rod contouring, which was represented by the angle between the cephalad endplate of the UIV and the caudal endplate of the second vertebra caudal to the UIV. Unmatched proximal rod contouring was regarded if the postoperative PRCA-PJA difference was greater than 5°. Results This study finally included 73 patients. The mean age at the index surgery was 6.5 ± 2.2 years (range, 2–10 years). Mean follow-up lasted 5.0 ± 1.7 years (range, 2–9 years). They received mean 4.6 ± 1.6 lengthening procedures. There were 13 patients who were observed with PJK (18%). In comparison with the non-PJK group, the PJK group showed a larger preoperative major curve (82 ± 21° vs 70 ± 17°, P = 0.041) and global kyphosis (57 ± 6° vs. 44 ± 15°, P = 0.044). In addition, the PJK group had significantly larger postoperative PJA (10 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 3, P <0.001) and greater postoperative PJA-PRCA (6 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 3, P = 0.031). The proportion of patients with unmatched proximal rod contouring in PJK group was significantly higher than that in the non-PJK group (69% vs. 25%). Multiple logistic regression showed that preoperative GK>50°, postoperative PJA>10 and postoperative unmatched proximal rod contouring were the risk factors in predicting PJK after TGR treatment. Conclusion Approximately 18% EOS patients experienced PJK after TGR treatment. Unmatched proximal rod contouring may be an independent risk factor of PJK occurrence, in addition to greater preoperative GK and larger postoperative PJA. Level of evidence 3.
Outcome and Complications of Growing Rods for Correction of Hyperkyphotic Early-Onset Scoliosis

Chen Zhonghui,Wang Bin,Qiu Yong,Zhu Zezhang,Chen Xi,Li Song,Xu Liang,Sun Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.14.001

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the changes in sagittal profiles and complications during treatment with growing rods (GRs) in hyperkyphotic early-onset scoliosis (EOS).Methods From December 2009 to December 2016,a total of 32 EOS patients who received growing rods treatment in our center,including 8 males and 24 females,were reviewed retrospectively.All the patients had minimum 2-year follow-up and over 2 lengthenings.Based on the reference value of thoracic kyphosis (TK) in T2-12 of normal children,the patients were categorized into an N group (20°≤TK≤50°,15 cases,4 males and 11 females) or K group (TK≥50°,17 cases,4 males and 13 females).The distribution of etiology was similar between the two groups.The average age was (6.2±2.0) years and (6.3±2.3) years respectively,curve flexibility was 34.6％± 10.4％ and 35.8％± 11.2％ before surgery.The precontoured rods were tunneled submuscularly,connecting proximal and distal anchors,and tandem or domino connectors.The rods were then locked after applying direct distraction that allowed appropriate elongation.The connectors were all placed under the deep fascia.Results The mean follow-up in the N and K groups was (5.5±1.9) years and (5.5±2.1) years,respectively.The distribution of proximal and distal anchors was similar between the two groups.The N and K groups,respectively,had an average number of lengthenings of 5.1±2.0 and 5.3±2.3,with mean lengthening intervals of (11.3±2.3) months and (10.9±1.9) months,respectively.In the N group,TK was decreased from 36.0°±9.4° to 30.6°±.8.3° after surgery,and to 32.2°±7.8° at the last follow-up,demonstrating it was maintained within the normal range.In the K group,TK was markedly reduced from 67.6°±11.6° to 41.7°±8.7° after the index surgery,with a correction rate of 38.3％± 14.6％,and the difference was statistically significant.And then it slightly increased to 46.5°±8.4° at the last follow-up,with correction loss of 7.1％±4.2％,and the difference was not statistically significant compared with the postoperatiom.The complication rate in the K group was significantly higher than in the N group (76.5％ vs.33.3％,P=0.031).The most common implant-and alignment-related complication in both groups was rod fracture (15.6％) and proximal junctional kyphosis (21.9％),respectively.The incidence of rod fracture in the N group and K group was 6.7％ and 23.5％,respectively.And the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis was noted as 13.3％ and 29.4％ in the N group and K group,respectively.Proximal junctional angle (PJA) in the K group was greater than that in the N group preoperatively,postoperatively and at the last follow-up.Moreover,the increasing amount of PJA was significantly greater in the K group compared to the N group (1.6°± 1.0° vs.0.7°±0.8°).Four and seven complication events in the N and K groups,respectively,were evaluated with Grade Ⅰ.Four and seven complication events in the N and K groups,respectively,were classified as Grade Ⅱ A.Conclusion GRs can effectively restore the sagittal profile in hyperkyphotie EOS patients,but with a higher complication rate compared to the patients with normal kyphosis.
Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis

Hiroko Matsumoto,Rishi Sinha,Benjamin D Roye,Jacob R Ball,Kira F Skaggs,Jaysson T Brooks,Michelle C Welborn,John B Emans,Jason B Anari,Charles E Johnston,Behrooz A Akbarnia,Michael G Vitale,Robert F Murphy,Pediatric Spine Study Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00543-3

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe contraindications to the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) by establishing consensus amongst expert surgeons who treat these patients frequently. Methods: Nine pediatric spine surgeons from an international EOS study group participated in semi-structured interviews via email to identify factors that influence decision making in the use of MCGR. A 39-question survey was then developed to specify these factors as contraindications for MCGR-these included patient age and size, etiology, medical comorbidities, coronal and sagittal curve profiles, and skin and soft tissue characteristics. Pediatric spine surgeons from the EOS international study group were invited to complete the survey. A second 29-item survey was created to determine details and clarify results from the first survey. Responses were analyzed for consensus (> 70%), near consensus (60-69%), and no consensus/variability (< 60%) for MCGR contraindication. Results: 56 surgeons of 173 invited (32%) completed the first survey, and 64 (37%) completed the second survey. Responders had a mean of over 15 years in practice (range 1-45) with over 6 years of experience with using MCGR (range 2-12). 71.4% of respondents agreed that patient size characteristics should be considered as contraindications, including BMI (81.3%) and spinal height (84.4%), although a specific BMI range or a specific minimum spinal height were not agreed upon. Among surgeons who agreed that skin and soft tissue problems were contraindications (78.6%), insufficient soft tissue (98%) and skin (89%) to cover MCGR were specified. Among surgeons who reported curve stiffness as a contraindication (85.9%), there was agreement that this curve stiffness should be defined by clinical evaluation (78.2%) and by traction films (72.3%). Among surgeons who reported sagittal curve characteristics as contraindications, hyperkyphosis (95.3%) and sagittal curve apex above T3 (70%) were specified. Surgeons who indicated the need for repetitive MRI as a contraindication (79.7%) agreed that image quality (72.9%) and not patient safety (13.6%) was the concern. In the entire cohort, consensus was not achieved on the following factors: patient age (57.4%), medical comorbidities (46.4%), etiology (53.6%), and coronal curve characteristics (58.9%). Conclusion: Surgeon consensus suggests that MCGR should be avoided in patients who have insufficient spinal height to accommodate the MCGR, have potential skin and soft tissue inadequacy, have too stiff a spinal curve, have too much kyphosis, and require repetitive MRI, particularly of the spine. Future data-driven studies using this framework are warranted to generate more specific criteria (e.g. specific degrees of kyphosis) to facilitate clinical decision making for EOS patients. Level of evidence: Level V-expert opinion.
Outcome of distraction-based growing rods at graduation: a comparison of traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods

Jwalant Mehta,Suken Shah,Harry Hothi,Martina Tognini,Adrian Gardner,Charles E Johnston,Robert Murphy,George Thompson,Paul Sponseller,John Emans,Francisco Javier-Grueso,Peter Strum,Pediatric Spine Study Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00969-x

2024-09-23

Abstract:Introduction: Distraction-based growing rods have been considered as an alternative surgical option for the operative treatment of EOS. TGR has been challenged by MCGR, which is reported to have the advantage of non-invasive lengthening with fewer planned returns to theatre. This study explores the radiographic outcomes, Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room (UPROR) and complication profile of both the procedures at the end of the planned growing rod treatment with either TGR or MCGR. Methods: We included all the EOS cases from the PSSG database that underwent either TGR or MCGR with spine-based proximal anchors, followed up to the time of graduation. Any crossover or hybrid procedures were excluded. 549 patients (409 TGR and 140 MCGR) were eligible for review. We measured the coronal curve magnitude, Kyphosis, T1-T12, T1-S1 and L1-S1 lengths at 4 time points (before and after the index surgery and before and after the definitive surgery). Results: The TGR group were slightly younger at the time of the index procedure (7 years for TGR vs. 8.5 years for MCGR, p < 0.001). We noted an improvement in all radiological parameters after the growing rod implantation. The spinal lengths increased through the lengthening period, while the coronal curve magnitude and the kyphosis increased. The kyphosis normalized following the final fusion, the coronal curve magnitude reduced further with a further increase in spinal lengths. The final follow-up from the time of the index implantation to the definitive surgery was 5.1 years (IQR 3.8) in TGR and 3.5 years (IQR 1.65) in the MCGR groups. The total number of complications was fewer in the MCGR group. The overall risk of UPROR was lower in the MCGR group and implant breakage was less in the MCGR group by 4.7 times. Conclusions: This study confirms the equivalence of both the distraction-based growing rods systems from the radiological stand-point, during the lengthening phase and at the time of the definitive surgery. The TGR was more kyphogenic during the lengthening period. The complications and UPROR were fewer in the MCGR groups.
How Does Hyperkyphotic Early-Onset Scoliosis Respond to Growing Rod Treatment?

Zhonghui Chen,Yong Qiu,Zezhang Zhu,Song Li,Xi Chen,Xu Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000000905

2017-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Growing rods (GRs) pose a higher risk of kyphosis gain while improving coronal deformity with intermittent distractions in early-onset scoliosis (EOS), but in turn, increased kyphosis may also affect GR correction outcomes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of GRs on the sagittal spinal profiles in hyperkyphotic EOS. Thus, we aim to demonstrate how hyperkyphotic EOS responds to GRs treatment.METHODS:Forty patients treated with GRs for EOS were included and categorized into a normal kyphosis (N) group [20 degrees≤thoracic kyphosis (TK)≤50 degrees] or hyperkyphosis group (K) group (TK≥50 degrees). Radiographic measurements were performed before and after the index surgery and at the last follow-up. The complications were identified and classified using the surgical complications grading system.RESULTS:The N group included 13 patients with dual GRs and 6 patients with a single GR. The K group consisted of 17 patients with dual GRs and 4 patients with a single GR. The mean age at surgery in the N and K groups was 6.2±1.8 and 6.4±2.1 years, respectively. The N and K groups, respectively, had an average number of lengthenings of 4.2±2.0 and 4.3±2.3, with an average follow-up of 4.7±1.9 and 4.6±2.1 years, respectively. In the K group, TK was markedly reduced after the index surgery and slightly increased during follow-up, whereas changes in TK in the N group were not significant. The complication rate in the K group was significantly higher than in the N group (81.0% vs. 47.4%, P=0.046). The most common implant-related and alignment-related complication in both groups was rod fracture (17.5%) and proximal junctional kyphosis (22.5%), respectively. The complication events in the N group were 5 with grade I and 5 with grade IIA, whereas in the K group there were 8 with grade I and 11 with grade IIA.CONCLUSIONS:GRs can effectively correct hyperkyphotic EOS, with the sagittal profile being successfully restored to normal range. However, hyperkyphotic EOS tends to experience more complications such as rod fracture and PJK.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III.
Comparison of the Effects of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod and Tradiotinal Growing Rod Techniques on the Sagittal Plane in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis

Sinan Erdoğan,Barış Polat,Yunus Atıcı,Osman Nuri Özyalvaç,Çağatay Öztürk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0094

2019-09-01

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Comparing the effects of magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and traditional growing rod (TGR) techniques on the sagittal plane in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS).METHODS: Twelve patients were operated using dual MCGR technique in one center, while 15 patients were operated using dual TGR technique for EOS in another center. Patients' demographic characteristics, complications and radiological measurements such as cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, T1-S1 range (mm), proximal junctional angle, distal junctional angle, sagittal balance, coronal balance, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt were assessed and compared in preoperative, postoperative and last follow-up period.RESULTS: Age and sex distributions were similar in both groups. The mean number of lengthening in the MCGR group was 12 (8-15) and 4.8 (3-7) in the TGR group. Two techniques were shown to be effective in controlling the curvature and in the increase of T1-S1 distance. In TGR group, four patients had rod fractures, six patients had screw pull-out and four patients had an infection, whereas three patients had screw pull-out and one patient had infection complications in the MCGR group.CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of cobb angle, coronal and sagittal balance and sagittal pelvic parameters. MCGR can cause hypokyphosis and proximal junctional kyphosis in a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The implant-related complications were less in the MCGR group. However, larger case groups and longer follow-up periods are required for the better understanding of the superiority of one method on other in terms of complications.

surgery,clinical neurology
A re-evaluation of the effects of dual growing rods on apical vertebral rotation in patients with early-onset scoliosis and a minimum of two lengthening procedures: a CT-based study.

Liang Xu,Yong Qiu,Zhonghui Chen,Benlong Shi,Xi Chen,Song Li,Changzhi Du,Zezhang Zhu,Xu Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.3.PEDS1832

2018-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the correction results of traditional dual growing rods (DGRs) on axial rotation using CT scans and to further explore the relationships between axial and torso deformities in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). METHODS Patients with EOS who were treated with traditional DGRs between January 2006 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Plain radiographs were used to assess the degree of coronal and sagittal deformity. The apical vertebral rotation (AVR) and rib hump (RH) were measured on CT scans at the apical vertebra. Pearson or Spearman rank correlation analyses were used to analyze the associations between spinal and torso deformities. RESULTS A total of 27 patients (10 boys and 17 girls, average age 6.5 +/- 1.7 years) were enrolled in this study. The average number of lengthenings per patient was 5.0 +/- 1.9, with a mean follow-up duration of 52.9 +/- 18.2 months. The apical vertebral translation, apical vertebral body-rib ratio (AVB-R), AVR, and RH parameters were significantly decreased after the initial surgery (p < 0.05) but showed notable progression at the latest follow-up evaluation (p < 0.05). The pre-operative AVR and its correction after index surgery were significantly correlated with the preoperative values as well as with the corrections of the major Cobb angle, AVB-R, and RH. During the follow-up period, significant correlations were found between the deterioration of AVR and the AVB-R and also between the deterioration of AVR and the RH from the initial surgery to the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Significant AVR correction can be achieved by DGR techniques after the initial surgery. However, this technique weakly prevents the deterioration of AVR during the follow-up period.
Vascular transformation of lymph node sinuses due to venous obstruction.

O. Haferkamp,W. Rosenau,K. Lennert

1971-08-01

Abstract:
Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Other Distraction-Based Surgical Technologies for Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E Dimitra Bednar,Brad Bergin,Waleed Kishta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00062

2021-01-20

Abstract:Background: Severe and progressive early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has a serious prognosis including cardiopulmonary compromise. Growth-friendly technologies are the current surgical standard of care. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are newer implants with the potential for better quality of life and cost savings; however, they have not been well compared with the traditional distraction-based implants. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes, complications, metal ion levels, quality-of-life outcomes, and cost of MCGRs with other distraction-based surgical technologies for the treatment of EOS. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched. Record screening and data abstraction were completed in duplicate. Summary outcomes were calculated in a meta-analysis, if heterogeneity was appropriate, using a fixed-effects model. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 18 studies. MCGRs were as clinically effective as other distraction-based technologies, with no significant difference in the Cobb angle at the latest follow-up (mean difference [MD], 1.20°; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.80° to 4.20°; p = 0.43) and a significantly lower complication rate (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.71; p = 0.001). Quality of life measured using the EOSQ-24 (24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire) was better in the MCGR group compared with other technologies (MD, 2.18; 95% CI, 0.40 to 3.95; p = 0.02). Serum titanium levels were 2.98 ng/mL (95% CI, 1.41 to 4.55 ng/mL; p = 0.0002) greater in patients with MCGRs, but the clinical impact is unclear. MCGRs had greater cost for the device and insertion but became cost-neutral or cost-effective compared with other technologies by 4 years postoperatively. Conclusions: MCGRs are clinically equivalent and cost-effective in the long term compared with other distraction-based technologies for the treatment of EOS. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

Gupta, Anuj,Srivastava, Abhishek,Pandita, Naveen,Goswami, Ankur,Vijayaraghavan, Govindaraja Perumal,Jayaswal, Arvind

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08301-x

IF: 2.721

2024-05-16

European Spine Journal

Abstract:Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has always been a challenging situation for spine surgeons. The aim of treatment is to control the direction of curve progression to allow for the complete development of lungs. Among all the growth constructs available, traditional growth rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR) are most widely used. The MCGR has been introduced a few years back and there is a dearth of long-term follow-up studies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TGR and MCGR for the treatment of EOS.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis—A Surgical Technique Video

Pawel Grabala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14060548

IF: 3.5083

2024-05-22

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract:Background: Spinal deformities in children and adolescents can be easily divided into those occurring and diagnosed before the age of 10—early-onset scoliosis—and those occurring and diagnosed after the age of 10—late-onset scoliosis. When the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of more than 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. The most common treatment procedure for EOS is the surgical correction of the deformity using standard growing rods (SGRs), and in the case of congenital defects with additional hemivertebrae, it is the resection of the hemivertebra and short fusion. Minimally invasive controlled growing rods (MICGRs) need to be distracted every 6–9 months through a minimally invasive approach that involves sedation and neuromonitoring to obtain the best possible correction while minimizing complications. The aim of our study is to present a less-invasive surgical technique for MICGR implantation based on a two-case presentation—early-onset idiopathic scoliosis and congenital kyphosis. The surgical technique is the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MICGRs without long incisions in the back. Conclusions: The use of MICGRs is an alternative and safe surgical technique for patients undergoing surgical treatment for EOS. Without the risk of metallosis, like in other implant systems, and the need for replacement after 2 years of use, like in using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), the MICGR system can be used as a less-invasive procedure, allowing for the avoidance of many periodic invasive procedures in children with a wider opening of the spine (like in using standard growing rods), minimizing the number of planned hospitalizations, reducing the length of hospital stays, and reducing the physical and mental burdens on young patients, parents, and families.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Under-contouring of rods: a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior correction of Scheuermann kyphosis

Michael Grelat,Chang-Zhi Du,Liang Xu,Xu Sun,Yong Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.5.SPINE20229

2020-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) could require surgical treatment in certain situations. A posterior reduction is the most widespread treatment so far, although the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is one of the possible complications of this procedure. The contour of the proximal part of the rod could influence the occurrence of PJK in SK patients. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the proximal rod contour on the occurrence of a PJK complication in SK patients. METHODS This retrospective monocentric study was performed in the Nanjing Spine Surgery Department. All eligible patients had undergone posterior correction surgery with pedicle screws only between 2002 and 2017 and had at least 24 months of follow-up. The presence of PJK was quantified on radiographs using the proximal junctional angle (PJA > 10 degrees at the last follow- up). The authors propose a new radiological parameter to measure the angulation of the proximal part of the instrumentation: the proximal contouring rod angle (PCRA) is the angle between the upper endplate of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the lower endplate of the second vertebra caudal to the UIV. The patients were analyzed according to the presence or absence of PJK. A t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and logistic regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS Sixty-two patients treated for SK were included in this study. The mean age was 18.6 +/- 8.5 years, and the mean follow-up was 42.5 +/- 16.4 months. The mean correction rate of global kyphosis was 46.4% +/- 13.7%. At the last follow-up, 17 patients (27.4%) presented with PJK. No significant difference was found between the PJK and non- PJK groups in terms of age and other preoperative variables. A significant difference in the postoperative PCRA was found between the PJK and non- PJK groups (8.2 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees vs 15.7 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees, respectively; p = 0.001). A postoperative PCRA less than 10.1 degrees predicted a significantly higher risk for PJK (p = 0.002, OR 2.431, 95% CI 1.781-4.133). CONCLUSIONS Under-contouring of the proximal part of the rods (lower than 10 degrees) is a risk factor for PJK after posterior correction of SK.
The activity of human kidney arylsulfatases A and B towards catecholamine sulfates.

S. Demassieux,Y. Romain,L. Bordeleau,D. Gravel,S. Carrière

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/O86-138

1986-10-01

Abstract:Both arylsulfatases (EC 3.1.6.1, ARS) A and B purified from human kidney displayed Michaelis-Menten kinetics towards catecholamines sulfates as substrates with Km values in the range of 4-25 mM. ARS A hydrolyzed adrenaline 3-sulfate and noradrenaline 3-sulfate with a maximal rate lower than that observed for cerebroside 3-sulfate. In contrast, ARS B hydrolyzed adrenaline 3-sulfate and noradrenaline 3-sulfate with a maximal rate similar to that observed for UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfate.
Optimal Timing of Starting Growing Rod Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis

Sinian Wang,Xiaojiang Pu,Xu Sun,Bin Wang,Zezhang Zhu,Yong Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.005

IF: 4.297

2024-01-01

The Spine Journal

Abstract:Background Context Growing rod (GR) systems require periodical surgical intervention and may cause associated complications, as well as worsened sagittal plane deformity. Generally, the risk of complications decreases with increment in age at the time of the index surgery with GR construct placement. However, the optimal timing to begin GR treatment has not reached a consensus yet. Purpose This study was performed to investigate the effect of age at the index GR surgery on the complication rates and formulate clinical guidelines for the optimal timing to begin GR treatment for EOS patients. Study Design Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine complication occurrence as a function of the age at the index surgery and to determine the survival rates for the procedures. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine optimal cut-off values for the optimal timing of index surgery based on whether complication occurred or not. Patient Sample 54 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in this study. Outcome Measures The following spinal parameters were measured: major coronal Cobb angle, global kyphosis (GK), and coronal balance (CB). CB was defined as the horizontal distance from the C7 plumb line to the center sacral vertical line. Methods All patients had completed GR treatment and had a minimum 1-year follow-up duration after the final surgical intervention. Patient data were collected as follows: age at the index surgery, gender, diagnosis, type of GR construct, and the number of lengthening procedures. The standing full-spine radiographs were obtained before and after the index surgery, before and after each lengthening procedures, before and after the final surgical intervention, and at the latest follow-up. Complications were categorized as implant, alignment, and general. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis of complications demonstrated a declining trend in complication rates with increasing age at the index surgery. The absence of perioperative complications was targeted, we constructed the ROC curve and the cut-off value was 71.0 months. Age at the index surgery was therefore categorized into two groups: younger-age group (≤ 71.0 months) and advanced-age group (> 71.0 months). There was a higher complication rate for the younger-age group than versus the advanced-age group (61.5% vs 22.0%, P=0.011). PJK as a major alignment-related complication, was more frequent in the younger-age group than in the advanced-age group (30.8% vs 4.9%, P=0.025). But the advanced-age group exhibited significantly more severe deformities before GR surgery compared to the younger-age group. Conclusions This study shows that the elevated risk of complications observed in the younger-age group, which can be attributed to the younger age at the index surgery and the increased number of lengthening procedures during treatment. We suggest deferring the initiation of GR treatment until after the age of six years for EOS patients. We hope it will serve as a basis for GR technique in the treatment of EOS, with the ultimate goal of enhancing treatment outcomes for this challenging disorder.
Evolution of the postoperative sagittal spinal profile in early-onset scoliosis: is there a difference between rib-based and spine-based growth-friendly instrumentation?

Zhonghui Chen,Song Li,Yong Qiu,Zezhang Zhu,Xi Chen,Liang Xu,Xu Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.PEDS17233

2017-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE Although the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) and growing rod instrumentation (GRI) encourage spinal growth via regular lengthening, they can create different results because of their different fixation patterns and mechanisms in correcting scoliosis. Previous studies have focused comparisons on coronal plane deformity with minimal attention to the sagittal profile. In this retrospective study, the authors aimed to compare the evolution of the sagittal spinal profile in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with VEPTR versus GRI. METHODS The data for 11 patients with VEPTR and 22 with GRI were reviewed. All patients had more than 2 years' follow-up with more than 2 lengthening procedures. Radiographic measurements were performed before and after the index surgery and at the latest follow-up. The complications in both groups were recorded. RESULTS Patients in both groups had similar diagnoses, age at the index surgery, and number of lengthening procedures. The changes in the major coronal Cobb angle and T1-S1 spinal height were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Compared with the GRI group, the VEPTR group had less correction in thoracic kyphosis (23% +/- 12% vs 44% +/- 16%, p < 0.001) after the index surgery and experienced a greater correction loss in thoracic kyphosis (46% +/- 18% vs 11% +/- 8%, p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. Although the increase in the proximal junctional angle was not significantly different (VEPTR: 7 degrees +/- 4 degrees vs GRI: 8 degrees +/- 5 degrees, p = 0.569), the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis was relatively lower in the VEPTR group (VEPTR: 18.2% vs GRI: 22.7%). No significant changes in the spinopelvic parameters were observed, while the sagittal vertical axis showed a tendency toward a neutral position in both groups. The overall complication rate was higher in the VEPTR group than in the GRI group (72.7% vs 54.5%). CONCLUSIONS The VEPTR had coronal correction and spinal growth results similar to those with GRI. In the sagittal plane, however, the VEPTR was not comparable to the GRI in controlling thoracic kyphosis. Thus, for hyperkyphotic EOS patients, GRI is recommended over VEPTR.
Similar surgical outcomes of the growing rod technique for treatment of early-onset scoliosis with versus without untreated intraspinal anomalies

Hongru Ma,Benlong Shi,Yang Li,Dun Liu,Zhen Liu,Xu Sun,Yong Qiu,Zezhang Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20785

2021-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients with or without intraspinal anomalies (IAs) managed with growing rods (GRs), and to evaluate the safety of the GR technique in EOS patients with untreated IAs. METHODS EOS patients undergoing GR placement between August 2008 and July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with untreated IAs were classified into the EOS+IA group, and those without IAs into the EOS-IA group. The radiographic parameters including Cobb angle of the major curve, T1-S1 height, and apical vertebral translation were measured, and a detailed assessment of the neurological status was performed at each visit. RESULTS Seventy-six patients with EOS (32 boys, 44 girls) with an average age of 6.5 +/- 2.3 years at initial surgery satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 28 patients in the EOS+IA group and 48 patients in the EOS-IA group. The radiographic measurements were comparable between groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. One patient in the EOS+IA group experienced sensory deficit in a unilateral lower extremity after initial surgery, and an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring event was observed in a patient in the EOS-IA group. No permanent neurological deficit was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS EOS patients with and those without IAs had comparable clinical and radiological outcomes of the GR technique. Repeated lengthening procedures may be safe for EOS patients with untreated IAs.
Dual Growing Rods Combined With the Apical Convex Control Pedicle Screw Technique Versus Traditional Dual Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

Yiwei Zhao,You Du,Yang Yang,Guanfeng Lin,Jianxiong Shen,Nan Wu,Qianyu Zhuang,Shengru Wang,Jianguo Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002431

IF: 5.315

2023-03-03

Neurosurgery

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Combination of apical control convex pedicle screws (ACPS) with traditional dual growing rods (TDGRs) had better apex control ability for early-onset scoliosis (EOS); however, there is a paucity of studies on the ACPS technique.OBJECTIVE: To compare 3-dimensional deformity correction parameters and complications between the apical control technique (DGR + ACPS) and TDGR in the treatment of EOS.METHODS: A retrospective case-match analysis consisting of 12 cases of EOS treated with the DGR + ACPS technique (group A) from 2010 to 2020, and matched with TDGR case (group B) at a ratio of 1:1 by age, sex, curve type, major curve degree, and apical vertebral translation (AVT). Clinical assessment and radiological parameters were measured and compared.RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, preoperative main curve, and AVT were comparable between groups. The correction ability of the main curve, AVT, and apex vertebral rotation were better in group A at index surgery (P < .05). The increase in T1-S1 and T1-T12 height was large in group A at index surgery (P = .011, P = .074). The annual increase in spinal height was slower in group A, but without significant difference. The surgical time and estimated blood loss were comparable. Six complications occurred in group A, and 10 occurred in group B.CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, ACPS seems to provide better correction of apex deformity, while attaining the comparable spinal height at 2-year follow-up. Larger cases and longer follow-up are needed to achieve reproducible and optimal results.

surgery,clinical neurology
Outcomes of growing rods in a series of early-onset scoliosis patients with neurofibromatosis type 1

Charlie Bouthors,Ruben Dukan,Christophe Glorion,Lotfi Miladi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.SPINE191308

2020-04-24

Abstract:Objective: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is not uncommon in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite conservative treatment, spinal deformities progress and require early surgical intervention. To avoid potential interference with chest and trunk growth, growing rods (GRs) have been used effectively in EOS of various etiologies. In this study the authors sought to analyze the outcomes of GRs in EOS patients with NF1. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study that included consecutive EOS patients with NF1 who were treated with GRs and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical and radiological analyses were performed preoperatively and until the last follow-up. Results: From to 2008 to 2017, 18 patients (6 male, 12 female) underwent GR surgery (14 single GRs, 4 dual GRs) at a mean age of 8 ± 2.1 years. Mean follow-up was 5 ± 2.4 years. Fifty-five lengthenings were performed at a mean rate of 3 lengthenings per patient (range 0-7). Ten of 14 single GRs (71%) were converted into dual GRs during treatment. No patient underwent definitive posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at GR treatment completion. The mean initial and last follow-up major curves were 57° and 36°, respectively (p < 0.001, 37% correction). The average T1-S1 increase was 13 mm/yr. Six of 9 hyperkyphotic patients had normal kyphosis at last follow-up. There were 26 complications involving 13 patients (72%), with 1 patient who required unplanned revision. The primary complications were instrumentation related, consisting of 17 proximal hook dislodgments, 6 distal pedicle screw pullouts, and 2 rod fractures. Only 1 patient experienced a mechanical complication after dual GR implantation. There were no wound infections. Conclusions: The GR technique provided satisfactory spinal deformity control in EOS patients with NF1 while allowing substantial spinal growth. Adequately contoured dual GRs with proximal hooks placed in nondystrophic regions should be used to minimize implant-related complications. Surgeons should not attempt to correct kyphosis at GR implantation.

Diurnal pattern of choline concentrations in serum of pigs as influenced by dietary choline or lecithin intake

Use of growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis with type 1 neurofibromatosis

Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years

Unmatched Rod Contouring at the Proximal End Predisposes to Occurrence of Junctional Kyphosis in Early-Onset Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Traditional Growing Rods Treatment

Outcome and Complications of Growing Rods for Correction of Hyperkyphotic Early-Onset Scoliosis

Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis

Outcome of distraction-based growing rods at graduation: a comparison of traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods

How Does Hyperkyphotic Early-Onset Scoliosis Respond to Growing Rod Treatment?

Comparison of the Effects of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod and Tradiotinal Growing Rod Techniques on the Sagittal Plane in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis

A re-evaluation of the effects of dual growing rods on apical vertebral rotation in patients with early-onset scoliosis and a minimum of two lengthening procedures: a CT-based study.

Vascular transformation of lymph node sinuses due to venous obstruction.

Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Other Distraction-Based Surgical Technologies for Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis—A Surgical Technique Video

Under-contouring of rods: a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior correction of Scheuermann kyphosis

The activity of human kidney arylsulfatases A and B towards catecholamine sulfates.

Optimal Timing of Starting Growing Rod Treatment for Early-onset Scoliosis

Evolution of the postoperative sagittal spinal profile in early-onset scoliosis: is there a difference between rib-based and spine-based growth-friendly instrumentation?

Similar surgical outcomes of the growing rod technique for treatment of early-onset scoliosis with versus without untreated intraspinal anomalies

Dual Growing Rods Combined With the Apical Convex Control Pedicle Screw Technique Versus Traditional Dual Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

Outcomes of growing rods in a series of early-onset scoliosis patients with neurofibromatosis type 1