Abstract:Background: Moral evaluation is identified as the first stage in the theory of moral judgment, and academics believe that it may align with the social intuitionist model. This study aims to prove that the model's emotional dominance hypothesis applies to moral evaluation by presenting a computational decision-making model that mathematically formalizes this emotional dominance decision-making process. We also compared different types of valence evaluation tasks to test the emotional priority hypothesis. Methods: We used a convenience sampling method to randomly recruit 30 enrolled college students. The drift-diffusion model was employed to analyze reaction times for words with various emotional and moral valences Additionally, we designed different valence evaluation tasks based on the response relevance hypothesis and evaluated the processing order through reaction time comparisons. Results: The analysis revealed that the emotional mechanism of immoral evaluation differs from moral evaluation. An increase in emotional valence accelerates the speed of evidence accumulation (v) for moral evaluation (M = 1.21, 0.2% < 0 < 99.8%) but lowers decision caution (a) in immoral evaluation (M = −0.64, 96.1% < 0 < 3.9%). In contrast, moral valence does not have a significant influence on evaluation processes (v, M = −0.28, 72.1% < 0 < 27.9%; a, M = −0.32, 79.3% < 0 < 20.7%). Furthermore, We found no significant difference in reaction times between moral and immoral words in the emotional evaluation task (F(1,29) = 0.55, p = 0.464, partial η2 = 0.02), but a significant difference existed in the moral evaluation task (F(1,29) = 17.99, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.38), indicating that the tendency of relatively fast immoral evaluation in emotional evaluation tasks may be caused by emotional priority. Conclusions: Our findings support the intuitive model's emotional dominance hypothesis and introduce a new emotional mechanism into moral evaluation. This study clarifies the distinct emotional processes in moral and immoral evaluations, fills a gap in the research on moral evaluation, and offers insights into human decision-making in moral contexts.

An Integration of Social Information Processing Modal on Aggression and Moral Domain Theory

The Automatic Processing of Social Information in Working Memory.

Agent-based Social Psychology: from Neurocognitive Processes to Social Data

Social Information-Processing Bases of Aggressive Behavior in Children

A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion

Social Cognitive Neuroscience:Approach,Research and the Future

Why (and how) should we study the interplay between emotional arousal, Theory of Mind, and inhibitory control to understand moral cognition?

Social information processing patterns as mediators of the interaction between genetic factors and life experiences in the development of aggressive behavior.

CogIntAc: Modeling the Relationships between Intention, Emotion and Action in Interactive Process from Cognitive Perspective

Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review

Moral foundations in an interacting neural networks society

The Neurobiology of Moral Cognition: Relation to Theory of Mind, Empathy, and Mind-Wandering

Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model

Cognitive and social-cognitive factors as mediators of aggression using structural equation modeling

The Relationship Between Emotion and Cognition with Moral Self-regulation

Human-centred artificial intelligence: a contextual morality perspective

A functional neuroimaging investigation of Moral Foundations Theory

A Computational Study on Emotions and Temperament in Multi-Agent Systems

How are moral foundations associated with empathic traits and moral identity?

How does Modality Matter? Investigating the Synthesis and Effects of Multi-modal Robot Behavior on Social Intelligence

Living Slow and Being Moral : Life History Predicts the Dual Process of Other-Centered Reasoning and Judgments