Abstract:Introduction Individual patient safety processes (such as reporting, investigating, learning and improving patient outcomes) activated following serious adverse incidents (e.g. patient suicide) are not distinct or standalone. Rather, they are embedded within a complex system of multiple interdependent processes enacted by individuals who are subject to an array of implicit and explicit influences (Nathan et al. BJPsych Advances 2022; 1-11). Although some specific elements of the response to adverse incidents have been examined, no previous empirical research has set out to study the complex interacting system within which these elements are situated. Objectives This study's aim was to characterise a complex patient safety system and to identify types of processes across that system that have an impact on the goal of improving patient safety. Methods Recorded 1:1 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with staff in a range of patient safety roles across a mental health care system to elicit accounts of the system response to serious adverse incidents. These interviews were transcribed, and the transcriptions were subject to thematic analysis using the Framework Method for qualitative research in health care settings (Gale et al. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2013; 13.1; 1-8).This preliminary study relates to the analysis of 8 interviews. Results The following six main types of influences on the effectiveness of patient safety system responses to adverse incidents were identified: 1. Differing functions/expectations of investigations into serious incidents (due to differing demands of different parties, such as the health provider, the family, the coroner, etc); 2. Differing methodologies used to investigate serious adverse incidents (although system-based generally preferred, there was a noted risk that this approach may fail to identify occasional examples of poor practice); 3. Relationship between incident investigation processes and patient safety processes (with a particular potential for the latter to dominate the system at the expense of the former); 4. System complexity (multiple interacting processes/processors at multiple levels within the health provider and wider health system); 5. Operationalising recommendations from investigations (with the potential for adverse unintended patient safety consequences) 6. Influence of national directives Conclusions As well as paying attention to individual components of the safety system (e.g. investigation methodology and organisational culture), the development of an effective patient safety system is dependent on an understanding of the complex interacting processes across the system. This study sheds empirical light on key influences that act across a mental health provider system. Both researchers of patient safety and providers intending to improve their approach to patient safety should take account of such systemic influences on effectiveness. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Involving Patients and/or Their Next of Kin in Serious Adverse Event Investigations: A Qualitative Study on Hospital Perspectives

Patient perspectives on adverse event investigations in health care

Responses to serious adverse incidents in mental health care settings: a qualitative study of a complex patient safety system

Involvement in serious incident investigations: a qualitative documentary analysis of NHS trust policies in England

Beyond error: A qualitative study of human factors in serious adverse events

Patient safety in surgical settings: A study on the challenges and improvement strategies in adverse event reporting from a nursing perspective

Risk Controls Identified in Action Plans Following Serious Incident Investigations in Secondary Care: A Qualitative Study

Patient safety incidents in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of trainee experience from a single UK healthcare region*

From identifying patient safety risks to reporting patient complaints: A grounded theory study on patients' hospital experiences

Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study

Safety incident reporting and barriers (SIRaB) study: Strategies and approaches for investigating patient safety events in a hospital set‐up

How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch

Registered nurses' experiences of near misses in ambulance care - A critical incident technique study

External inspection approaches and involvement of stakeholders' views in inspection following serious incidents - a qualitative mixed methods study from the perspectives of regulatory inspectors

Introduction of a Novel Patient Safety Advisory: Evaluation of Perceived Information With a Modified QPP Questionnaire—A Case-Control Study

Naming the "baby" or the "beast"? The importance of concepts and labels in healthcare safety investigation

Adverse events at the end of life of hospital patients with or without a condition relevant for palliative care: a nationwide retrospective record review study in the Netherlands

The influence of environmental conditions on safety management in hospitals: a qualitative study

Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies

Actions for mitigating the negative effects of patient participation in patient safety: a qualitative study

Onsite serious adverse events reporting: Seven-year experience of the institutional ethics committee of a tertiary care hospital