Abstract:Background: Patient-centered care and patient involvement have been increasingly recognized as crucial elements of patient safety. However, patient safety has rarely been evaluated from the patient perspective with a quantitative approach aiming at making patient safety and preventable adverse events measurable. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire assessing patient safety by perceived triggers of preventable adverse events among patients in primary health-care settings while considering mental health. Methods: Two hundred and ten participants were recruited through various digital and print channels and asked to complete an online survey between November 2019 and April 2020. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify domains of triggers of preventable adverse events affecting patient safety. Furthermore, a multi-trait scaling analysis was performed to evaluate internal reliability as well as item-scale convergent-discriminant validity. A multivariate analysis of covariance evaluated whether individuals below and above the symptom threshold for depression and generalized anxiety perceive triggers of preventable adverse events differently. Results: The five factors determined were information and communication with patients, time constraints of health-care professionals, diagnosis and treatment, hygiene and communication among health-care professionals, and knowledge and operational procedures. The questionnaire demonstrated a good total and subscale internal consistency (α = 0.90, range = 0.75-0.88), good item-scale convergent validity with significant correlations between 0.57 and 0.78 (P < 0.05; P < 0.01) for all items with their associated subscales, and satisfactory item-scale discriminant validity between 0.14 and 0.55 (P > 0.05) with no significant correlations between the items and their competing subscales. The questionnaire further revealed to be a generic measure irrespective of patients' mental health status. Patients older than 50 years of age perceived a significantly greater threat to their own safety compared to patients below that age. Conclusion: The developed Perceptions of Preventable Adverse Events Assessment Tool (PPAEAT) exhibits good psychometric properties, which supports its use in future research and primary health-care practice. Further validation of the PPAEAT in different settings, languages and larger samples is needed. The results of this study need to be considered when assessing patient safety in the context of health-care research.

Introduction of a Novel Patient Safety Advisory: Evaluation of Perceived Information With a Modified QPP Questionnaire—A Case-Control Study

Patient and caregiver perspectives on causes and prevention of ambulatory adverse events: multilingual qualitative study

Promoting Patient Engagement in Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Novel Approach Utilizing Set Induction-Based Skill Questionnaires

Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention

Questionnaires measuring patient participation in patient safety-A systematic review

Changing medical student attitudes to patient safety: a multicentre study

Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: Comparing APEAS–2007 (Spanish Patient Safety Adverse Events Study in Primary Care) with Data from a Health Area in Catalonia (Spain) in 2019

Patient safety and patient assessment in pre-hospital care: a study protocol

Evolving Factors in Hospital Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital Adverse Events

Perceptions of Clinical Adverse Event Reporting by Nurses and Midwives

[Evolution of the perception of the safety culture of healthcare professionals in a pediatric emergency department]

Safety incident reporting and barriers (SIRaB) study: Strategies and approaches for investigating patient safety events in a hospital set‐up

Development of the perceptions of preventable adverse events assessment tool (PPAEAT): measurement properties and patients' mental health status

Instruments and Warning Signs for Identifying and Evaluating the Frequency of Adverse Events in Intermediate and Long-Term Care Centres: A Narrative Systematic Review

Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Safety Culture, Patient Safety Competency, and Adverse Events

Patient safety in surgical settings: A study on the challenges and improvement strategies in adverse event reporting from a nursing perspective

Patient involvement in patient safety: How willing are patients to participate?

Investigation on the intention and inlfuencing factors of reporting adverse events in clinical nursing students

Attitudes of Internal Medicine Nurses, Surgical Nurses and Midwives towards Reporting of Clinical Adverse Events

Patients’ safety perception among undergraduate medical students

Patterns of Safety Incidents in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit