Identification of Candidates for MASLD Treatment With Indeterminate Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography

David Marti-Aguado,José Miguel Carot-Sierra,Aida Villalba-Ortiz,Harris Siddiqi,Rose Marie Vallejo-Vigo,Carmen Lara-Romero,Marta Martín-Fernández,Matías Fernández-Patón,Clara Alfaro-Cervello,Ana Crespo,Elena Coello,Víctor Merino-Murgui,Egbert Madamba,Salvador Benlloch,Judith Pérez-Rojas,Víctor Puglia,Antonio Ferrández,Victoria Aguilera,Cristina Monton,Desamparados Escudero-García,Paloma Lluch,Rocío Aller,Rohit Loomba,Manuel Romero-Gomez,Luis Marti-Bonmati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.014
IF: 13.576
2024-12-12
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Background and Aims A noteworthy proportion of patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) have an indeterminate vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Among these patients, we aimed to identify candidates for MASLD treatment by diagnosing significant fibrosis. Methods This was a real-world prospective study including a large dataset of MASLD patients with paired VCTE and liver biopsy from 6 centers. A total of 1196 patients were recruited and divided in training (3 centers, Spain), internal validation (2 centers, Spain), and external validation (1 center, United States) cohorts. In patients with indeterminate liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (8–12 kPa), a diagnostic algorithm was developed to identify significant fibrosis, defined as histological stage ≥F2. Statistical analysis was performed using Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and k-means unsupervised clusterization. Results From the eligible population, 33%, 29%, and 31% had indeterminate VCTE in the training, internal and external validation samples, respectively. The controlled attenuation parameter allowed the differentiation of GMM clusters with a cutoff of 280 dB/m (area under the curve, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.97). Within patients with <280 dB/m, a LSM between 8.0–9.0 kPa showed a 93% sensitivity and a 91% negative predictive value to exclude significant fibrosis. Among patients with ≥280 dB/m, a LSM between 10.3 and 12.0 kPa diagnosed significant fibrosis with a 91% specificity. Applying this algorithm to the validation cohorts, 36% of the indeterminate VCTE were reallocated. The reallocated high-risk group showed a prevalence of 86% significant fibrosis, opening the therapeutic window for MASLD patients. Conclusions To identify candidates for MASLD treatment among indeterminate VCTE, an algorithm-based on the sequential combination of LSM and controlled attenuation parameter thresholds can optimize the diagnosis of moderate-to-advanced fibrosis.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?