Sequential embryo transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion improved pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure

Wenda Zou,Dan Liu,Juan Peng,Zhijing Tang,Yukun Li,Juan Zhang,Ziwei Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02966-8
2024-02-17
BMC Women s Health
Abstract:To compare the application of sequential embryo transfer, cleavage embryo transfer, and blastocyst transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion in frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles in patients with recurrent implantation failure to provide a reference for reproductive clinicians.
public, environmental & occupational health,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to solve the embryo transfer problems in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Specifically, the study compared the application effects of sequential embryo transfer, cleavage - stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion in the frozen - thawed embryo transfer cycle, in order to provide references for reproductive clinicians. #### Key issues: 1. **Definition of recurrent implantation failure**: It refers to the failure to achieve clinical pregnancy after three or more transfers of at least four high - quality cleavage - stage embryos. 2. **Existing challenges**: Although the improvements in in - vitro fertilization - embryo transfer (IVF - ET) technology and embryo culture systems have increased the number and quality of embryos, the growth of embryo implantation rate is still limited, especially RIF reduces the success rate of IVF. 3. **Complex reasons**: The reasons for RIF are complex and diverse, including maternal factors (such as psychological factors, anatomical abnormalities of the reproductive system, abnormal endometrial development function, etc.), embryo factors (such as defects in embryonic genetic material, poor hatching and development potential, etc.), and other related factors (such as patient management, clinical management and laboratory quality control, etc.). ### Research purposes By comparing three different embryo transfer strategies (sequential embryo transfer, cleavage - stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer) combined with intrauterine perfusion technology, evaluate their clinical pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients to find a more effective embryo transfer method. #### Main objectives: - Increase the embryo implantation rate and pregnancy success rate. - Reduce the risk of ectopic pregnancy. - Explore whether sequential embryo transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion can become a favorable transfer strategy for RIF patients. ### Method overview The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 166 RIF patients who underwent frozen - thawed embryo transfer in a reproductive center from January 2021 to March 2022. According to the different types of embryos transferred, the patients were divided into three groups: - Cleavage - stage embryo transfer group (Group A, 72 cases) - Blastocyst transfer group (Group B, 29 cases) - Sequential embryo transfer group (Group C, 65 cases) All three groups of patients received intrauterine perfusion treatment 5 days before embryo transfer. The study compared the general data and clinical pregnancy outcome indicators of each group, such as embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate and twin rate, etc. ### Results summary The results showed that the embryo implantation rate (53.1%), clinical pregnancy rate (76.9%), ongoing pregnancy rate (67.7%) and live birth rate (66.15%) in the sequential embryo transfer group (Group C) were significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the ectopic pregnancy rate was lower. ### Conclusion Sequential embryo transfer combined with intrauterine perfusion partially improves the clinical pregnancy outcomes of frozen - embryo cycle transfer and reduces the risk of ectopic pregnancy, and may be a favorable transfer reference strategy for RIF patients. ### Formula examples Some statistical analysis results involved in the paper can be presented in Markdown format formulas: - Mean ± standard deviation: `\( \text{Age} = 32.54 \pm 3.43 \)` - Median (25th percentile, 75th percentile): `\( \text{BMI} = 22.43 (20.59, 25.03) \)` - Proportion (%): `\( \text{Male infertility} = 41.67\% (30/72) \)` These formulas ensure the accuracy and readability of the data.