Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures

A Siebe De Boer,Duncan E Meuffels,Cornelis H Van der Vlies,P Ted Den Hoed,Wim E Tuinebreijer,Michael H J Verhofstad,Esther M M Van Lieshout
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314
IF: 3.006
2017-11-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture. Design Multicentre, prospective observational study. Setting This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals. Participants In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up. Primary and secondary outcome measures Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined. Results Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points. Conclusions The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome. Trial registration number NTR5613; Post-results.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?