Abstract:Category: Ankle; Sports Introduction/Purpose: Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) occurred with an incidence of 2.5 per 100,000 person-years in 2016. This rate has been increasing over the last decade and it has been postulated that this is due to the increasing activity level of older people. With a high and increasing incidence of such a significant injury, further investigation must be done to optimize the treatment of ATRs. The degree of tendon lengthening has been correlated with clinical outcomes, with greater elongation being associated with worse outcomes. MRI and ultrasound techniques have been validated in measurement of Achilles tendon. We sought to develop a reliable, reproducible, and accurate measurement technique utilizing the manual palpation of anatomic landmarks that will be cost effective as well as convenient to perform, particularly intraoperatively. Methods: Both lower legs of 10 healthy subjects without history of Achilles tendon injury were examined using ultrasound and anatomic landmark-based measurement techniques. Subjects sat upright on the exam table and legs were held in flexion at the knee with slight external rotation with the ankle held at 90o, allowing the lower leg to rest flat on the exam table. The length from the medial head of the gastrocnemius to the bottom of the non-compressed heal pad was measured by three raters using the ultrasound and anatomic landmark-based techniques for inter-rater reliability. The measurements were repeated one week later for intra-rater reliability. Ultrasound measurements had excellent inter-rater (0.93) and intra-rater (0.82) correlation coefficients, while good inter-rater (0.76) and intra-rater (0.86) correlation coefficients were observed among anatomic landmark-based measurements. Achilles tendon length measured with ultrasound and anatomic landmark-based techniques were compared using a paired t-test. Results: The anatomic landmark-based technique produces longer measurements of the Achilles tendon (23.2 cm (sd 2.6 cm)) compared to measurements made using ultrasound (22.4 cm (sd 2.6)) (p<0.001). On average, the anatomic landmark-based technique measures 0.8 cm (95% Confidence Interval: 0.4, 1.2) longer than the ultrasound technique. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the anatomic landmark-based and ultrasound measurements is 0.90. Conclusion: While the anatomic landmark-based technique produces a longer measurement of the Achilles tendon, it may still be a reproducible measurement tool. If the change in tendon length is of interest, this technique may be a valid and simple way to monitor that variable. Comparison with MRI may be warranted to better determine the accuracy of the anatomic landmark-based Achilles tendon measure. These results compared with MRI may set the stage for further evaluation of this measurement technique in the operating room in subjects undergoing ATR repair.

Reliability and validation of the German Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

Validity and reliability of the Achilles tendon total rupture score

Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Achilles tendon total rupture score

Performance of the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score Over Time in a Large National Database: Development of an Instruction Manual for Accurate Use

Establishment of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score in a Swedish Population

[Validation and reliability testing of the "Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ)"]

The ALR-RSI score can be used to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after acute Achilles tendon tear

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A) for Use With Arabic-Speaking Patients With Achilles Tendinopathy

Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability

Early Predictors of Recovery From Nonoperatively Treated Achilles Tendon Rupture: 1 Year Follow-Up Study

Relationship between tendon structure, stiffness, gait patterns and patient reported outcomes during the early stages of recovery after an Achilles tendon rupture

Predictors of functional outcome in non-operatively managed Achilles tendon ruptures

Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture – a multicentre, non-inferiority analysis

TENDINopathy Severity assessment–Achilles (TENDINS-A): evaluation of reliability and validity in accordance with COSMIN recommendations

Musculotendinous ruptures of the achilles tendon had greater heel-rise height index compared with mid-substance rupture with non-operative management: A retrospective cohort study

The French Ankle Ligament Reconstruction - Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI-Fr) is a valid scale for the French population

Portable device for measuring isometric plantar-flexion force after open Achilles repair: Retrospective cohort of 30 recreational athletes with one-year minimum follow-up

Development and field testing of a patient decision aid for management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a study protocol

Early Functional Rehabilitation Compared with Traditional Immobilization for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures : a Meta-Analysis.

Development of an Anatomic Landmark-Based Measurement of the Achilles Tendon

Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Patients with Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Undergoing Primary Repair Vs. Augmented Repair with a Gastrocnemius Turn-Down Flap