Objective sleep quality predicts subjective sleep ratings

Róbert Pierson-Bartel,Péter Przemyslaw Ujma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56668-0

IF: 4.6

2024-03-13

Scientific Reports

Abstract:In both clinical and observational studies, sleep quality is usually assessed by subjective self-report. The literature is mixed about how accurately these self-reports track objectively (e.g. via polysomnography) assessed sleep quality, with frequent reports of little to no association. However, previous research on this question focused on between-subject designs, which may be confounded by trait-level variables. In the current study, we used the novel Budapest Sleep, Experiences and Traits Study (BSETS) dataset to investigate if within-subject differences in subjectively reported sleep quality are related to sleep macrostructure and quantitative EEG variables assessed using a mobile EEG headband. We found clear evidence that self-reported sleep quality in the morning is influenced by within-subject variations in sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency. These effects were replicated if detailed sleep composition metrics (percentage and latency of specific vigilance states) or two alternative measures of subjective sleep quality were used instead. We found no effect of the number of awakenings or relative EEG delta and sigma power. Between-subject effects (relationships between individual mean values of sleep metrics and subjective sleep quality) were also found, highlighting that analyses focusing only on these may be erroneous. Our findings show that while previous investigations of this issue may have been confounded by between-subject effects, objective sleep quality is indeed reflected in subjective sleep ratings.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The problems the paper attempts to solve

The paper aims to address the relationship between subjective sleep quality assessment and objective sleep quality measurement. Specifically, the author attempts to answer the following questions:

1. **Accuracy of subjective sleep quality assessment**: Previous studies have shown that there may be little or no correlation between subjectively self - reported sleep quality and sleep quality measured by objective means such as polysomnography. Most of these studies adopted a between - subject design, that is, each participant only provided one subjective and objective sleep quality assessment. However, this design may be interfered by trait - level variables (such as personality, response tendency, etc.), resulting in inaccurate correlation estimates.

2. **The influence of within - subject differences**: To overcome the above problems, this study used the Budapest Sleep, Experiences and Traits Study (BSETS) dataset, which is a large - scale dataset containing mobile EEG data for seven consecutive nights and subjective sleep quality scores of more than 250 participants. Through a multi - day observational study design, researchers can analyze the relationship between the subjective and objective sleep quality of the same participant on different nights, thereby more accurately assessing the changes within individuals.

3. **Application of multilevel models**: To distinguish between between - individual effects and within - individual effects, the author used multilevel regression models. This enables the study not only to assess the mean relationship between different individuals, but also to assess the fluctuations of the same person on different nights, thereby more comprehensively understanding the relationship between subjective and objective sleep quality.

### Main findings of the study

- **Correlation between subjective and objective sleep quality**: The study found that subjectively reported morning sleep quality is indeed affected by within - individual changes, such as sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time and sleep efficiency. These effects still exist when using detailed sleep component indicators (such as the percentage and latency of specific alertness states) or alternative subjective sleep quality measurement methods.

- **Factors with no significant influence**: The study did not find that the number of awakenings or the relative EEG delta and sigma power had a significant impact on subjective sleep quality.

- **Existence of between - subject effects**: Although the mean relationship between individuals also exists, focusing only on these relationships may lead to wrong conclusions. Therefore, the study emphasizes the importance of analyzing changes within individuals.

### Conclusion

This study fills the gaps in the existing literature and proves that although previous studies may be confounded by between - subject effects, objective sleep quality is indeed reflected in subjective sleep ratings. Through a multi - day observational study design, researchers can more accurately capture the fluctuations of sleep quality within individuals and provide an important reference for future studies.

---

I hope the above summary can help you better understand the core problems of this paper and their importance. If you have any further questions or need more detailed information, please feel free to let me know!