Multiomics Characterization of a Less Invasive Microfluidic-Based Cell Sorting Technique

Feroza K. Choudhury,Viji Premkumar,Jana Zecha,Jonathan Boyd,Andrew S. Gaynor,Zengli Guo,Tom Martin,Raffaello Cimbro,Erik L. Allman,Sonja Hess
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00773
2024-02-28
Journal of Proteome Research
Abstract:Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is a specialized technique to isolate specific cell subpopulations with a high level of recovery and accuracy. However, the cell sorting procedure can impact the viability and metabolic state of cells. Here, we performed a comparative study and evaluated the impact of traditional high-pressure charged droplet-based and microfluidic chip-based sorting on the metabolic and phosphoproteomic profile of different cell types. While microfluidic chip-based sorted cells more closely resembled the unsorted control group for most cell types tested, the droplet-based sorted cells showed significant metabolic and phosphoproteomic alterations. In particular, greater changes in redox and energy status were present in cells sorted with the droplet-based cell sorter along with larger shifts in proteostasis. <sup>13</sup>C-isotope tracing analysis on cells recovering postsorting revealed that the sorter-induced suppression of mitochondrial TCA cycle activity recovered faster in the microfluidic chip-based sorted group. Apart from this, amino acid and lipid biosynthesis pathways were suppressed in sorted cells, with minimum impact and faster recovery in the microfluidic chip-based sorted group. These results indicate microfluidic chip-based sorting has a minimum impact on metabolism and is less disruptive compared to droplet-based sorting.
biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to compare the effects of the traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology and the microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology on the metabolic and phosphoproteomic characteristics of different cell types. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the effects of the two sorting methods on the cell metabolic state, oxidative stress level, energy - metabolism pathways, and amino - acid and lipid biosynthesis pathways, and to explore how these effects recover over time. ### Research Background Fluorescence - activated cell sorting (FACS) is a technique used to isolate specific cell subpopulations, with high recovery rates and accuracy. However, the cell - sorting process may affect the cell survival rate and metabolic state. The traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology (such as BD FACS Aria Fusion) and the microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology (such as MACSQuant Tyto) will exert different external stresses on cells during the sorting process, such as high pressure, shear stress, high - voltage electric fields, or laser irradiation, and these stresses may cause damage to cells. ### Research Objectives By comparing the effects of these two sorting techniques on the metabolic and phosphoproteomic characteristics of different cell types, this study aims to: 1. Evaluate the effects of the traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology and the microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology on the cell metabolic state. 2. Compare the effects of the two sorting techniques on the cell oxidative stress level, energy - metabolism pathways, and amino - acid and lipid biosynthesis pathways. 3. Explore the recovery of these effects after sorting, especially by using 13C stable isotope tracer experiments to analyze the recovery speed of cell - metabolic activities. ### Main Findings 1. **Metabolic Effects**: The microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology has less impact on the metabolism of most tested cell types, while the traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology causes significant metabolic changes, especially in the redox state and energy metabolism. 2. **Oxidative Stress**: The traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology induces a higher oxidative stress level, manifested as a higher GSSG/GSH ratio and ROS accumulation. 3. **Energy Metabolism**: Through 13C stable isotope tracer experiments, it was found that the traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology inhibits mitochondrial TCA cycle activity and has a slower recovery speed; while the microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology has less inhibitory effect on the TCA cycle and a faster recovery speed. 4. **Amino - Acid and Lipid Biosynthesis**: The traditional high - pressure charged droplet cell sorting technology has a greater inhibitory effect on amino - acid and lipid biosynthesis pathways, while the microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology has less impact and a faster recovery speed. ### Conclusion The microfluidic - chip - based cell sorting technology has less impact on the cell metabolic state and causes less damage to cells, indicating that this technology can better maintain the original metabolic state of cells during the cell - sorting process, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of downstream research.