Abstract:One of the most impressive testimonies to the unity of mankind lies in the fact that certain basic features of social structure have been determined in different areas by the existence of similar conditions. Thus in ancient Egypt, in Japan, in early American cultures and among Indo-European peoples sociological analysis shows the rise of aristocracy to have been due to the coincidence of certain irrational, deepseated, retrospective convictions with certain economic conditions. Repeatedly the evolution of a ruling class runs back into that prehistoric darkness when related tribes first united to form a primordial political community; in the earliest historic age of such a community we find the members of this regarded as descendants of the gods or even as their earthly embodiments. It is on this belief in their divine origins that the great base their claim to a monopoly of political and economic power, the latter including disposal of the labor of the unfree. The same belief leads them to perpetuate themselves as a caste; their family lines must not be contaminated by the blood of the low-born. The mass of the free-born accepts this social order as divinely ordained. There is no sign of any consciousness of oppression nor thought of revolt against the privileges of the aristocracy. The latter for its part carefully heeds the rights of common mortals. There is either no tradition of a golden age of equality, or if there is some legend of a lost paradise, it fails to incite revolt against an order sanctified by immemorial existence. A society based on respect for an hereditary aristocracy that monopolized the best land could not be subverted by any forces generated solely within the lower classes. Discontent could become revolutionary only through the cultural developments that made it possible to ask the question, “When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?”

Dynasty: A Very Short Introduction

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

The Heir is Dead, Long Live the Heir: Succession Turnaround in Family Business

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

The Reigning Dynasty of Han in Chinese History

The Nobility in the European Middle Ages

From dynastic cycle to eternal dynasty: The Japanese notion of unbroken lineage in Chinese and Korean constitutionalist debates, 1890–1911

In the Shadows of Great Men: Leadership Turnovers and Power Dynamics in Autocracies

BRITISH MONARCHY: FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE?

Gender and Dynastic Political Selection

Power and Leadership: A Complex Systems Science Approach Part I - Representation and Dynamics

The Social Logic of High-Ranking Families'Rule of the State:A Review of Sun Benwen's Theory of Powerful Families

Safe for Democracy: Constitutional Politics, Popular Spectacle, and the British Monarchy 1910–1914

Parallel lives in contrast: Scars in the Roman Republic versus English hereditary monarchy

The business family 3.0: Dynastic business families as families, organizations and networks—Outline of a theory extension

Women and Power: The Power and Status of the Wives of the Dukes for Fulfilling the Sage in the Kong Lineage in Qufu Since the Qing Dynasty

Status in flux: Unequal alliances can create power vacuums

Ancient DNA traces family lines and political shifts in the Avar empire

"Abdication" and "Initial Year of a Dynasty":Change of Dynasty and the Writing of Dynastic History during the Wei-Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties

Autobiography: A Very Short Introduction

Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies