Abstract:Are women less likely to win elections than men? Past analyses of U.S. elections have found little evidence of gender bias, leading some scholars to declare: "When women run, women win." However, across many professional domains, women face disparate outcomes in achieving leadership positions. The current research resolves this puzzle through a novel theoretical perspective and methodological advances. Theoretically, we propose that power frees women from restrictive gender norms, reducing gender bias. Thus, gender bias likely exists in politics but is more pronounced for lower-power candidates and less pronounced for higher-power candidates. Because incumbent candidates have more power and challenger candidates less power, we predicted incumbent women would be shielded from gender bias and achieve electoral parity with incumbent men. Conversely, we predicted challenger women would face particularly strong gender bias and disparate outcomes. Methodologically, we resolve prior scope-of-analysis limitations by analyzing every governor and U.S. senator election since women's suffrage (1920). Further, we developed a novel bootstrapping method that resolves regression assumption violations inherent in statistical analyses of candidate-level measures. Analyses revealed 2 important findings. First, our comprehensive dataset revealed that, contrary to past research, women were less likely to win elections than men overall. Second, we found evidence for a power shield effect: Male challengers were three times more likely to win than female challengers, men were 25% more likely than women to win open-seat races, but female incumbents fared just as well as male incumbents. These results suggest that some gender differences may be power differences in disguise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Gender and Dynastic Political Selection

Gender bias in political candidate evaluation among voters: The role of party support and political gender attitudes

The power shield: Powerful roles eliminate gender disparities in political elections.

Beyond Supply and Demand: A Feminist-institutionalist Theory of Candidate Selection

A gender-generation gap in political representation? The contingent impact of preference voting in Norwegian municipal elections

The determinants of political selection: a citizen-candidate model with valence signaling and incumbency advantage

Gender, risk assessment, and political ambition

Free to represent you and me: Gender attitudes and women's share of parliament, 1995-2021

The gender gap in political interest: Heritability, gendered political socialization, and the enriched environment hypothesis

Explaining the Gender Gap in News Access Across Thirty Countries: Resources, Gender-Bias Signals, and Societal Development

Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in the Nordic Region

Beyond the party push: Gender differences in voters' persuasion

Gender Differences in Climbing up the Ladder: Why Experience Closes the Ambition Gender Gap

When the Party Decides: The Effects of Facial Competence and Dominance on Internal Nominations of Political Candidates

A suitable boy? Gendered roles and hierarchies in family business succession

Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis

Women in the Labor Market and Experienced Political Institutions

Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office

Preserving and progressing: Tensions in the gendered politics of military conscription

Political Difference in Marriage: Wife’s Gender Linked Fate and Relational Conflict

Selection committees for academic recruitment: does gender matter?