Abstract:Amid heightened political polarization in the United States, have politics worked their way into the bedroom? An increase in political similarity between romantic partners has consequences not just for romantic relationships but for society as a whole; political homophily increases our political echo chambers and affects future generations. We drew upon 11 data sets with over 4,000 individuals (including more than 500 couples) to test four preregistered research questions about the prevalence, correlates, consequences, and potential buffers of political dissimilarity in modern-day relationships. Across measures of similarity (overall perceptions, partisanship matching, shared political ideology), couples in our sample showed high levels of political similarity (e.g., 23% were cross-partisan, with fewer than 8% composed of one Democrat and one Republican). Examining 18 potential correlates of political dissimilarity, we found little evidence that certain factors predispose people to end up in a politically dissimilar relationship. When considering the potential consequences of political dissimilarity, we found a small association between political dissimilarity and relationship quality in general and in daily life. The effect was evident when examining perceived political dissimilarity (over and above perceptions of overall similarity) and, to a lesser extent, dissimilarity in terms of partisanship and political ideology. Prosocial processes such as appreciation and perspective-taking may moderate these effects. Taken together, these findings speak to the need to further consider the ways in which the sociopolitical context is shaping the formation and maintenance of close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Political Difference in Marriage: Wife’s Gender Linked Fate and Relational Conflict

I love you but I hate your politics: The role of political dissimilarity in romantic relationships

The unhappy marriage of religion and politics: problems and pitfalls for gender equality

Race, gender, and power in Asian American interracial marriages

Country differences in the link between gender-role attitudes and marital centrality: Evidence from 24 countries

Penalized for Challenging Traditional Gender Roles: Why Heterosexual Relationships in Which Women Wear the Pants May Be More Precarious

Marital Status and Advance Care Planning among Older Adults: Do Gendered Patterns Vary by Age?

Ideological Mate-guarding: Sexual Jealousy and Mating Strategy Predict Support for Female Honor

The Ties that Bind: Public Opinion and Linked Fate among Women of Color

Attitude alignment in marriage and cohabitation: The case of sex-role attitudes

In Sickness and in Wealth

What’s in a name? An experimental test of marital name change on perceptions of female political candidates

The control motive and marital violence

Gender and couple status differences in advance care planning: a cross-sectional study

Coming Home Upset: Gender, Marital Satisfaction, and the Daily Spillover of Workday Experience Into Couple Interactions.

Does ‘Love’ make a difference? Marriage choice and post-marriage decision-making power in India

Constellations of gender ideology, earnings arrangements, and marital satisfaction: a comparison across four East Asian societies

Fighting the good fight: Relating warmth and dominance across romantic conflict to resolution

How and Why Marriage is Related to Subjective Well-Being? Evidence from Chinese Society

The “Who” Matters: Types of Interpersonal Relationships and Avoidance of Political Disagreement

Marriage and health: His and hers.