The “Who” Matters: Types of Interpersonal Relationships and Avoidance of Political Disagreement

Alyssa C. Morey,William P. Eveland,Myiah J. Hutchens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.641070

IF: 6.176

2012-01-01

Political Communication

Abstract:Research consistently finds that we discuss politics most often with our strong ties (i.e., our close, intimate others). As our strong ties tend to be more politically similar to us than not, the conclusion is that everyday political discussions are overwhelmingly characterized by real or perceived political agreement. However, this scenario may paint only a partial portrait of everyday political discussion. Neglected is the distinction between politically similar discussion partners, on the one hand, and similarity of views expressed during conversation, on the other. Although our strong ties may be more politically similar to us than not, they may, paradoxically, be just the people with whom we are likely to express disagreement. Indeed, this study illustrates that although discussion with strong ties increases the probability of agreement, it simultaneously increases the likelihood of discussing disagreement.

political science,communication