Relation of life sciences students' metacognitive monitoring to neural activity during biology error detection

Mei Grace Behrendt,Carrie Clark,McKenna Elliott,Joseph Dauer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00231-z
2024-03-05
npj Science of Learning
Abstract:Metacognitive calibration—the capacity to accurately self-assess one's performance—forms the basis for error detection and self-monitoring and is a potential catalyst for conceptual change. Limited brain imaging research on authentic learning tasks implicates the lateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate brain regions in expert scientific reasoning. This study aimed to determine how variation in undergraduate life sciences students' metacognitive calibration relates to their brain activity when evaluating the accuracy of biological models. Fifty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory life sciences course completed a biology model error detection task during fMRI. Students with higher metacognitive calibration recruited lateral prefrontal regions linked in prior research to expert STEM reasoning to a greater extent than those with lower metacognitive calibration. Findings suggest that metacognition relates to important individual differences in undergraduate students' use of neural resources during an authentic educational task and underscore the importance of fostering metacognitive calibration in the classroom.
psychology, experimental,education & educational research,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of understanding how metacognitive calibration (i.e., the accuracy of self-assessment) of undergraduate life science students is related to brain activity when evaluating errors in biological models. Specifically, the study aims to determine whether differences in students' metacognitive calibration affect the extent to which they use specific brain regions, such as the lateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, when performing this task. ### Background and Significance - **Metacognitive Calibration**: Refers to the degree of match between students' subjective assessments of their performance and their actual performance. Good metacognitive calibration helps students monitor their performance, thereby better adjusting their learning strategies. - **Neural Activity**: Previous studies have shown that experts activate brain regions such as the lateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex more when engaging in scientific reasoning. These brain regions are associated with high-level cognitive control and error detection. - **Application in Educational Tasks**: Most neuroimaging studies on metacognitive calibration have used experimental tasks rather than real educational tasks. Therefore, this study attempts to fill this gap by exploring the neural basis of metacognitive calibration in real educational tasks. ### Research Methods - **Participants**: 50 undergraduate life science students. - **Task**: Participants completed a biological model error detection task in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanner. - **Measurement Indicators**: Included participants' task performance (accuracy), confidence ratings, and brain activity patterns. ### Main Findings - **Behavioral Results**: The average accuracy of students was 65%, while confidence was about 75%. Confidence in correct trials was significantly higher than in incorrect trials. - **Neuroimaging Results**: - In the contrast between confident and unconfident states, brain activity was widely distributed in the occipital, parietal cortex, and lateral and medial prefrontal cortex. - In the contrast between error models and non-error models, when students were confident, increased brain activity regions included the medial prefrontal cluster, bilateral inferior frontal/insula regions, and lingual gyrus. - In the contrast between confident and correct versus confident but incorrect, students showed significantly increased activity in the left lingual gyrus. - **Relationship Between Metacognitive Calibration and Brain Activity**: - Students with higher metacognitive calibration showed increased activity in the right lateral prefrontal cortex when evaluating error models. - After controlling for task accuracy, students with higher metacognitive calibration had stronger activity in the right lateral prefrontal cortex. ### Discussion - **Importance of Metacognitive Calibration**: Metacognitive calibration is related not only to students' behavioral performance but also to specific brain activity patterns. This suggests that metacognitive calibration may help students better engage in conceptual change by promoting high-level conflict resolution and the use of executive resources. - **Educational Significance**: The findings emphasize the importance of cultivating students' metacognitive abilities in education, especially in science education. By improving students' metacognitive calibration, their ability to learn and understand scientific concepts more effectively can be enhanced. ### Conclusion The study reveals the role of metacognitive calibration in the brain activity patterns of students when evaluating errors in biological models, providing a new perspective on the importance of metacognition in students' learning behavior. Future research can further explore how to improve students' metacognitive abilities through instructional design, thereby enhancing their academic performance.