Recurrent medical imaging exposures for the care of patients: one way forward

Donald Paul Frush,Jenia Vassileva,Marco Brambilla,Mahadevappa Mahesh,Madan Rehani,Ehsan Samei,Kimberly Applegate,John Bourland,Olivera Ciraj-Bjenlac,Danielle Dahlstrom,Vesna Gershan,Paddy Gilligan,Barbara Godthelp,Hakon Hjemly,Franz Kainberger,Miriam Mikhail-Lette,Ola Holmberg,Diana Paez,Suz Schrandt,Andreas Valentin,Tahera Van Deventer,Richard Wakeford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10659-x
IF: 7.034
2024-04-11
European Radiology
Abstract:Medical imaging is both valuable and essential in the care of patients. Much of this imaging depends on ionizing radiation with attendant responsibilities for judicious use when performing an examination. This responsibility applies in settings of both individual as well as multiple (recurrent) imaging with associated repeated radiation exposures. In addressing the roles and responsibilities of the medical communities in the paradigm of recurrent imaging, both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) have issued position statements, each affirmed by other organizations. The apparent difference in focus and approach has resulted in a lack of clarity and continued debate. Aiming towards a coherent approach in dealing with radiation exposure in recurrent imaging, the IAEA convened a panel of experts, the purpose of which was to identify common ground and reconcile divergent perspectives. The effort has led to clarifying recommendations for radiation exposure aspects of recurrent imaging, including the relevance of patient agency and the provider-patient covenant in clinical decision-making.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?