Abstract:Radiation and potential risk during medical imaging is one of the foremost issues for the imaging community. Because of this, there are growing demands for accountability, including appropriate use of ionizing radiation in diagnostic and image-guided procedures. Factors contributing to this include increasing use of medical imaging; increased scrutiny (from awareness to alarm) by patients/caregivers and the public over radiation risk; and mounting calls for accountability from regulatory, accrediting, healthcare coverage (e.g., Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), and advisory agencies and organizations as well as industry (e.g., NEMA XR-29, Standard Attributes on CT Equipment Related to Dose Optimization and Management). Current challenges include debates over uncertainty with risks with low-level radiation; lack of fully developed and targeted products for diagnostic imaging and radiation dose monitoring; lack of resources for and clarity surrounding dose monitoring programs; inconsistencies across and between practices for design, implementation and audit of dose monitoring programs; lack of interdisciplinary programs for radiation protection of patients; potential shortages in personnel for these and other consensus efforts; and training concerns as well as inconsistencies for competencies throughout medical providers' careers for radiation protection of patients. Medical care providers are currently in a purgatory between quality- and value-based imaging paradigms, a state that has yet to mature to reward this move to quality-based performance. There are also deficits in radiation expertise personnel in medicine. For example, health physics academic programs and graduates have recently declined, and medical physics residency openings are currently at a third of the number of graduates. However, leveraging solutions to the medical needs will require money and resources, beyond personnel alone. Energy and capital will need to be directed to:• innovative and cooperative cross-disciplinary institutional/practice oversight of and guidance for the use of diagnostic imaging (e.g., radiology, surgical specialties, cardiologists, and intensivists);• initiatives providing practical benchmarks (e.g., dose index registries);• comprehensive (consisting of access, integrity, metrology, analytics, informatics) and effective and efficient dose monitoring programs;• collaboration with industry;• improved use of imaging, such as through decision support combined with evidence-based appropriateness for imaging use;• integration with e-health such as medical records;• education, including information extending beyond the medical imaging community that is relevant to patients, public, and providers and administration;• identification of opportunities for alignment with salient media and advocacy organizations to deliver balanced information regarding medical radiation and risk;• open lines of communication between medical radiation experts and appropriate bodies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Joint Commission to assure appropriate guidance on documents and actions originating from these organizations; and• increased grant funding to foster translational work that advances understanding of low-level radiation and biological effects.

Radiation Overuse in Intensive Care Units

Radiation Exposure to Staff in Intensive Care Unit with Portable CT Scanner

Artificial intelligence for reducing the radiation burden of medical imaging for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease

Trends in Radiation at a Level I Trauma Center

SU-D-9A-07: Imaging Dose and Cancer Risk in Image-Guided Radiotherapy of Cancers

MRI and the Critical Care Patient: Clinical, Operational, and Financial Challenges

Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Recurrent medical imaging exposures for the care of patients: one way forward

Radiological management of COVID-19: structure your diagnostic path to guarantee a safe path

[New-old methods of reducing and monitoring x-ray exposure in the interventional radiology environment]

Radiation Dose Risk and Diagnostic Benefit in Imaging Investigations

Preparation of a radiology department in an Italian hospital dedicated to COVID-19 patients

Head CT Scans in the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Use or Overuse?

Optimizing the Strategy of Radiological Examination Reduces Iatrogenic Radiation Exposure in Major Trauma Patients

Meeting the Needs for Radiation Protection: Diagnostic Imaging

Assessing the prognostic utility of clinical and radiomic features for COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU: challenges and lessons learned

Implications for Cardiology Practice

CT Dose Optimization in Pediatric Radiology: A Multiyear Effort to Preserve the Benefits of Imaging While Reducing the Risks

"Navigating the risks of pediatric head trauma: the role of imaging and radiation safety"

Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI

Diagnostic Yield, Radiation Exposure, and the Role of Clinical Decision Rules to Limit Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography-Associated Complications.