Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Does Private Equity Investment Influence Enterprise Innovation Strategy?

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

Private Equity Investment and Corporate Technological Innovation: An Empirical Examination Based on Chinese Mainboard-listed High-Tech

Private equity market development, state ownership, and firm innovation: Evidence from China

The Impact of Private Equity on Corporate Innovation

Peer Effect of Enterprise Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China

The impact of investor interest protection on corporate innovation efficiency

Executive shareholding, institutional investor shareholding and enterprise innovation

Research on the Impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plan on Enterprise Innovation

Mixed ownership reform and non-state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from China

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

State‐owned equity participation and corporate green innovation: evidence from Chinese private enterprises

Impact of mixed ownership reforms on firm innovation–empirical evidence from China

A Study on the Effectiveness of IPO Approval in GEM

Work Experience of Private Entrepreneurs in SOEs and Enterprise Innovation Investment: Evidence from China

Competitive imitation and corporate innovation in private enterprises

Exploring the mesomeric effect of executive equity incentives on enterprise innovation: a study in the context of digital transformation

R&D Investment, Executive Incentive, and Financial Performance in GEM: Based on Three-Stage Least Squares Method

Employee Stock Ownership Plan,Financing Constraints and Ambidextrous Innovation Output of State?owned Enterprises