Abstract:Purpose This study attempts to document the impact of financial leverage on corporate innovation in the Chinese nonfinancial public firms listed on Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchanges. Design/methodology/approach The firm-level data are collected from CSMAR database for ten years, ranging from 2007 to 2016. The authors have employed the panel fixed effects model and further system GMM approach for analysis. The sample is segregated on the basis of state (SOE) and nonstate ownership (NSOE) to check for the diverse effects. In total, three different proxies of financial leverage are used to unearth the varying impact of short-time and long-term leverage separately. Further, corporate innovation is divided into input innovation (R&D/Sales and R&D/Assets) and output innovation (patents and inventions). Findings The results suggest that financial leverage is detrimental to the input innovation while conducive for the output innovation when measured by the number of patents. Contrarily, leverage has a negative influence over the output innovation when measured by the number of inventions. This implies that leverage is more damaging for the highest form of innovativeness (inventions) in China. Input innovation is more sensitive to the changes in long-term leverage versus short-term leverage. Further, the authors find that innovation in SOEs is more sensitive to the changes in the leverage as compared to the NSOEs. The results are free from the threat of endogeneity and identification problems, as reported by the system GMM model. Research limitations/implications The authors did not segregate the sample on the basis of industry/sector. Practical implications The firms pursuing a strategy of radical innovation should try to keep their debt levels lower in order to achieve a higher innovation performance. Although, a rise in the leverage may mean an increased access to finance for a firm but such an access comes at a cost in the form of damage to the corporate innovation. However, increased debt financing may not be so bad for the firms that want to achieve a moderate and not the highest level of innovation. Such firms can produce recurring and synergic effects with debt financing and moderate innovation, once they achieve a level of innovation performance that satisfies their financiers. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is probably the first study to check the impact of firm-level financial leverage on both input and output innovation in the Chinese public-listed nonfinancial firms' panel data perspective till now.

The Impact of Private Equity on Corporate Innovation

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

Private Equity Investment and Corporate Technological Innovation: An Empirical Examination Based on Chinese Mainboard-listed High-Tech

Does Private Equity Investment Spur Innovation? Evidence from Europe

Does Private Equity Investment Influence Enterprise Innovation Strategy?

Private equity market development, state ownership, and firm innovation: Evidence from China

The impact of big tech corporate venture capital investments on innovation: Evidence from the equity investment market

Empirical Study on Private Equity Fund and Corporate Real Investment

Private Equity Investment, Executive Motivation and Corporate Research and Development

The impact of investor interest protection on corporate innovation efficiency

Impact of technological innovation on corporate leverage in China: The moderating role of policy incentives and market competition

The impact of fintech on corporate innovation: mediating role of entrepreneurship

Executive shareholding, institutional investor shareholding and enterprise innovation

The Impact of Board Capital on Open Innovation with the Moderating Effect of Executive Equity Incentives

The Impacts of Executive Equity on Green Corporate Innovation

Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China

Exploring the Impact of Private Equity Investment on Corporate Performance: A Case Study Pharmablock

Private entrepreneurs' technical background and innovation output: The perspective of innovation quantity and quality

The impact of corporate R&D on the transformation of intellectual property into intangible assets

Financial leverage and corporate innovation in Chinese public-listed firms