Abstract:Background: Sleep is an important determinant of individuals' health and behavior during the wake phase. Novel research methods for field assessments are required to enable the monitoring of sleep over a prolonged period and across a large number of people. The ubiquity of smartphones offers new avenues for detecting rest-activity patterns in everyday life in a noninvasive an inexpensive manner and on a large scale. Recent studies provided evidence for the potential of smartphone interaction monitoring as a novel tracking method to approximate rest-activity patterns based on the timing of smartphone activity and inactivity throughout the 24-hour day. These findings require further replication and more detailed insights into interindividual variations in the associations and deviations with commonly used metrics for monitoring rest-activity patterns in everyday life. Objective: This study aimed to replicate and expand on earlier findings regarding the associations and deviations between smartphone keyboard-derived and self-reported estimates of the timing of the onset of the rest and active periods and the duration of the rest period. Moreover, we aimed to quantify interindividual variations in the associations and time differences between the 2 assessment modalities and to investigate to what extent general sleep quality, chronotype, and trait self-control moderate these associations and deviations. Methods: Students were recruited to participate in a 7-day experience sampling study with parallel smartphone keyboard interaction monitoring. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the data. Results: In total, 157 students participated in the study, with an overall response rate of 88.9% for the diaries. The results revealed moderate to strong relationships between the keyboard-derived and self-reported estimates, with stronger associations for the timing-related estimates (β ranging from .61 to .78) than for the duration-related estimates (β=.51 and β=.52). The relational strength between the time-related estimates was lower, but did not substantially differ for the duration-related estimates, among students experiencing more disturbances in their general sleep quality. Time differences between the keyboard-derived and self-reported estimates were, on average, small (<0.5 hours); however, large discrepancies were also registered for quite some nights. The time differences between the 2 assessment modalities were larger for both timing-related and rest duration-related estimates among students who reported more disturbances in their general sleep quality. Chronotype and trait self-control did not significantly moderate the associations and deviations between the 2 assessment modalities. Conclusions: We replicated the positive potential of smartphone keyboard interaction monitoring for estimating rest-activity patterns among populations of regular smartphone users. Chronotype and trait self-control did not significantly influence the metrics' accuracy, whereas general sleep quality did: the behavioral proxies obtained from smartphone interactions appeared to be less powerful among students who experienced lower general sleep quality. The generalization and underlying process of these findings require further investigation.

Estimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveys

Self-reported sleep duration and timing: A methodological review of event definitions, context, and timeframe of related questions

Subjective sleep measurement: comparing sleep diary to questionnaire

0751 Comparability of Self-Reported & Wearable-Measured Sleep & Predictors of Agreement in a Preconception Cohort

0969 Predicting Differences Between Objective and Subjective Sleep Parameters with Mental Health Questionnaires

0277 Improving the Validity of Self-Reported Sleep Duration: Experimental Comparisons of Question Format with Actigraphy

Naturalistic sleep tracking in a longitudinal cohort: how long is long enough?

0756 Validity of Self-reported Sleep in the Cancer Prevention Study – 3

Association of Objective and Self-Reported Sleep Duration with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: A Community-Based Study.

274 Multimodal longitudinal sleep tracking combining wearable, smartphone tap analysis and electronic questionnaires

Optimal Questions for Sleep in Epidemiological Studies: Comparisons of Subjective and Objective Measures in Laboratory and Field Studies

Sleep health epidemiology in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of poor sleep quality and sleep duration

0392 Insomnia with Short Sleep Duration Is Associated with Heart Disease and Stroke: Evidence from the UK Biobank Cohort

0279 Sleep Hygiene for Sleep Health in the General Population: What Does Data From Consumer Sleep Technology Tell Us?

Country differences in nocturnal sleep variability: Observations from a large-scale, long-term sleep wearable study

Evaluation of Sleep Habits and Disturbances Among US Adults, 2017-2020

Validation and performance of the sleep inertia questionnaire in central disorders of hypersomnolence

Self‐reported and accelerometry measures of sleep components in adolescents living in Pacific Island countries and territories: Exploring the role of sociocultural background

Smartphone Keyboard Interaction Monitoring as an Unobtrusive Method to Approximate Rest-Activity Patterns: Experience Sampling Study Investigating Interindividual and Metric-Specific Variations

0721 Association Between Subjective-Objective Sleep Time Discrepancy and Mortality in Older Men With/Without Insomnia

Diet quality, dietary patterns and short sleep duration: a cross-sectional population-based study