Abstract:Sleep timing varies between individuals and can be altered in mental and physical health conditions. Sleep and circadian sleep phenotypes, including circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, may be driven by endogenous physiological processes, exogeneous environmental light exposure along with social constraints and behavioural factors. Identifying the relative contributions of these driving factors to different phenotypes is essential for the design of personalised interventions. The timing of the human sleep-wake cycle has been modelled as an interaction of a relaxation oscillator (the sleep homeostat), a stable limit cycle oscillator with a near 24-hour period (the circadian process), man-made light exposure and the natural light-dark cycle generated by the Earth's rotation. However, these models have rarely been used to quantitatively describe sleep at the individual level. Here, we present a new Homeostatic-Circadian-Light model (HCL) which is simpler, more transparent and more computationally efficient than other available models and is designed to run using longitudinal sleep and light exposure data from wearable sensors. We carry out a systematic sensitivity analysis for all model parameters and discuss parameter identifiability. We demonstrate that individual sleep phenotypes in each of 34 older participants (65-83y) can be described by feeding individual participant light exposure patterns into the model and fitting two parameters that capture individual average sleep duration and timing. The fitted parameters describe endogenous drivers of sleep phenotypes. We then quantify exogenous drivers using a novel metric which encodes the circadian phase dependence of the response to light. Combining endogenous and exogeneous drivers better explains individual mean mid-sleep (adjusted R-squared 0.64) than either driver on its own (adjusted R-squared 0.08 and 0.17 respectively). Critically, our model and analysis highlights that different people exhibiting the same sleep phenotype may have different driving factors and opens the door to personalised interventions to regularize sleep-wake timing that are readily implementable with current digital health technology. Disrupted sleep has long term health consequences and affects our day-to-day ability to function physically, mentally and emotionally. But what determines when and how long we sleep? It is well-known that daily light exposure patterns determine the timing of the body clock. However, creating mathematical models that can take realistic light exposure patterns and predict plausible sleep timing has been challenging. Furthermore, nearly all previous studies have focused on developing models for average behaviour, yet sleep timing and duration are highly individual. In this paper, we present a simple model that combines sleep regulatory and circadian processes. The model can take individual light exposure patterns and, by fitting physiologically plausible parameters, describe individual mean sleep timing and duration. We test our model on data collected from 34 older participants. Our modelling approach suggests that some of the participants slept late because of physiological factors, while for other individuals, late sleep was a consequence of their light environment. This approach of combining a model with longitudinal data could be implemented in digital health technology such that your smart watch could tell you not only how you slept last night, but also how to change your light environment to sleep better tomorrow.

Naturalistic sleep tracking in a longitudinal cohort: how long is long enough?

1116 Naturalistic Sleep Tracking in a Longitudinal Cohort: How Long Is Long Enough?

1114 Evidence for Deep Sleep Homeostasis in Real World Sleep Tracking Data

Deep sleep homeostatic response to naturalistic sleep loss

274 Multimodal longitudinal sleep tracking combining wearable, smartphone tap analysis and electronic questionnaires

Five million nights: temporal dynamics in human sleep phenotypes

Predicting long-term sleep deprivation using wearable sensors and health surveys

Can People Sleep Too Much? Effects of Extended Sleep Opportunity on Sleep Duration and Timing

1109 The Impact of Sleep Duration and Its Variability on the Human Phenome: Analysis of All of Us Wearables Data

The Ultra‐Long‐Term Sleep study: Design, rationale, data stability and user perspective

Using the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative Data to conduct a genome-wide association study of sleep duration

Self-reported sleep duration and timing: A methodological review of event definitions, context, and timeframe of related questions

Day-to-day deviations in sleep parameters and biological aging: Findings from the NHANES 2011-2014

Method to determine whether sleep phenotypes are driven by endogenous circadian rhythms or environmental light by combining longitudinal data and personalised mathematical models

How many days are enough? Sleep–wake timing regularity and fragmentation scores change with the number of days included

Sleep duration over 28 years, cognition, gray matter volume, and white matter microstructure: a prospective cohort study

The Ecology of Human Sleep (EcoSleep) Project: Protocol for a longitudinal cohort repeated-measurement-burst study to assess the relationship between sleep determinants and sleep outcomes under real-world conditions across time of year

Observational study to understand the effect of timing and regularity on sleep metrics and cardiorespiratory parameters using data from a smart bed

0277 Improving the Validity of Self-Reported Sleep Duration: Experimental Comparisons of Question Format with Actigraphy

Associations of Long-term Sleep Duration Trajectories with Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Middle-to-older Aged Black and White Adults

0751 Comparability of Self-Reported & Wearable-Measured Sleep & Predictors of Agreement in a Preconception Cohort