Abstract:Despite the widespread availability of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services, consumer evaluations and adoption intentions have not met expectations. Existing research mainly focuses on AI's instrumental attributes from the consumer perspective, along with negative impacts of AI failures on evaluations and willingness to use. However, research is lacking on AI as a collaborative agent, investigating the impact of human-AI collaboration on AI acceptance under different outcome expectations. This study examines the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types (AI-dominant vs. AI-assisted) and outcome expectations (positive vs. negative) on AI product evaluations and usage willingness, along with the underlying mechanisms, from a human-AI relationship perspective. It also investigates the moderating role of algorithm transparency in these effects. Using three online experiments with analysis of variance and bootstrap methods, the study validates these interactive mechanisms, revealing the mediating role of attribution and moderating role of algorithm transparency. Experiment 1 confirms the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types and outcome expectations on consumer evaluations and usage willingness. Under positive outcome expectations, consumers evaluate and express willingness to use AI-dominant intelligent vehicles with autonomous driving capabilities higher than those with emergency evasion capabilities (AI-assisted). However, under negative outcome expectations, consumers rate autonomous driving capabilities lower compared to emergency evasion capabilities. Experiment 2 examines the mediating role of attribution through ChatGPT's dominant or assisting role under different outcome expectations. Experiment 3 uses a clinical decision-making system to study algorithm transparency's moderating role, showing higher transparency improves evaluations and willingness to use AI products and services under negative outcome expectations. Theoretically, this study advances consumer behavior research by exploring the human-AI relationship within artificial intelligence, enhancing understanding of consumer acceptance variations. Practically, it offers insights for better integrating AI products and services into the market.

When customer meets AI failure: expectation discrepancy perspective

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

When AI-based services fail: examining the effect of the self-AI connection on willingness to share negative word-of-mouth after service failures

How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability

When Frontline Robots Emerge: the Double-Edged-sword Effect of Anticipated Trust on Intention to Switch Brands after Service Failure

How Consumers Respond to Service Failures Caused by Algorithmic Mistakes: the Role of Algorithmic Interpretability

I can feel AI failure: the impact of service failure type and failure assessment on customer recovery expectation

When Algorithms Fail: Consumers’ Responses to Brand Harm Crises Caused by Algorithm Errors

Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence

The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution

How Does AI Agent (vs. IVR System) Service Failure Impact Customer Purchase Behavior: Mediating Effect of Customer Involvement

AI Failures: A Review of Underlying Issues

What algorithmic evaluation fails to deliver: respectful treatment and individualized consideration

“Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?

Understanding AI-based customer service resistance: A perspective of defective AI features and tri-dimensional distrusting beliefs

Thumbs Up or Down: Consumer Reactions to Decisions by Algorithms Versus Humans

When a Chatbot Disappoints You: Expectancy Violation in Human-Chatbot Interaction in a Social Support Context

To Err Is AI! Debugging as an Intervention to Facilitate Appropriate Reliance on AI Systems

Effects of the anthropomorphic image of intelligent customer service avatars on consumers' willingness to interact after service failures

Promise or Peril? When Human Efficacy Meets AI Capability Augmentation

Are companies better off with AI? The effect of AI service failure events on firm value