Abstract:Social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter have become major objects of criticism for reasons such as privacy violations, anticompetitive practices, and interference in public elections. Some of these problems have been associated with algorithms, but the roles that algorithms play in the emergence of different harms have not yet been systematically explored. This article contributes to closing this research gap with an investigation of the link between algorithms and harms on social media platforms. Evidence of harms involving social media algorithms was collected from media reports and academic papers within a two-year timeframe from 2018 to 2019, covering Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter. Harms with similar casual mechanisms were grouped together to inductively develop a typology of algorithmic harm based on the mechanisms involved in their emergence: (1) algorithmic errors, undesirable, or disturbing selections; (2) manipulation by users to achieve algorithmic outputs to harass other users or disrupt public discourse; (3) algorithmic reinforcement of pre-existing harms and inequalities in society; (4) enablement of harmful practices that are opaque and discriminatory; and (5) strengthening of platform power over users, markets, and society. Although the analysis emphasizes the role of algorithms as a cause of online harms, it also demonstrates that harms do not arise from the application of algorithms alone. Instead, harms can be best conceived of as socio-technical assemblages, composed of the use and design of algorithms, platform design, commercial interests, social practices, and context. The article concludes with reflections on possible governance interventions in response to identified socio-technical mechanisms of harm. Notably, while algorithmic errors may be fixed by platforms themselves, growing platform power calls for external oversight.

When Algorithms Fail: Consumers’ Responses to Brand Harm Crises Caused by Algorithm Errors

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes

Automated Trouble: The Role of Algorithmic Selection in Harms on Social Media Platforms

Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic Harm

Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion

User Perception of Algorithmic Digital Marketing in Conditions of Scarcity

When customer meets AI failure: expectation discrepancy perspective

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction

Consumer responses to human-AI collaboration at organizational frontlines: strategies to escape algorithm aversion in content creation

“Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?

Denied by an (Unexplainable) Algorithm: Teleological Explanations for Algorithmic Decisions Enhance Customer Satisfaction

How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability

Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult

When Self-Humanization Leads to Algorithm Aversion

Automating Automaticity: How the Context of Human Choice Affects the Extent of Algorithmic Bias

User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System:Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability

Algorithm Overdependence: How the Use of Algorithmic Recommendation Systems Can Increase Risks to Consumer Well-Being

Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decision-Making

Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences?

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature