Abstract:Objective The aims of this study were to assess: (1) concordance between patient preferences stated in advance care plans (ACPs) and hospital care over the subsequent 12 months; (2) change in preferences over time; (3) justifications for discordant care; and (4) effects of ACP completion on hospital utilisation. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 198 patients with an ACP form registered with an ACP registry and tagged with a hospital unique record number. Data collected from ACP forms and hospital records comprised ACP completion and revisions, care preferences, patient characteristics and hospital care. Instances of care discordant with preferences were analysed as Type A (no ascertainable justification) and Type B (direct patient request or appropriate clinical indications). In a survivor subset, hospital utilisation was compared before and after ACP completion. Results Mean (± s.d.) patient age was 79.5±11.8 years. Patients had a mean (± s.d.) of 5.5±2.5 comorbidities and 90 (46.4%) died within the 12 months after ACP completion. Most ACPs (130; 65.5%) were completed during index hospitalisation and 13 (6.5%) underwent revision, on average, 6.8 months later, all related to rescinding request for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hospital care was fully concordant for 154 (77.8%) patients, with 39 (22.2%) receiving 60 instances of discordant care (15 (25%) Type A, 45 (75%) Type B), mostly related to surgical procedures (20; 33%) and intravenous fluids or antibiotics (26; 43%). Patients receiving discordant care had higher mortality (77% vs 45%; P<0.001) and more rapid response team activations (34% vs 13%; P=0.001) at 12 months than patients with concordant care. Among the 108 confirmed survivors at 12 months after ACP completion, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient had decreased by ≥50% (P<0.001) and hospital days had decreased by 25% (P=0.042) compared with the 12 months before ACP completion. Conclusion Most patients completing an ACP received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences, with few revising their preferences over time. Discordant care mostly related to justified supportive treatments or surgical procedures. Among survivors, ACP completion was associated with decreased use of hospital care. What is known about the topic? ACPs that list patient preferences and care goals relieve family and patient distress and uncertainty regarding future care decisions as death approaches, decrease unwanted medical interventions and hospitalisations, and are associated with more patients dying at home. However, uncertainty surrounds the extent to which in-patient care provided to patients' concords with preferences stated in ACPs, which preferences are most adhered to, and whether preferences change over time, warranting revision of ACPs. What does this paper add? This retrospective study of 198 patients completing an ACP, of whom almost half died within the following 12 months, showed that more than 75% received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences and, for decedents, most died at their preferred place of death. Relatively few patients changed their documented preferences over time, and all changes were for less use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Instances of discordant care mostly related to the administration of supportive treatments or surgical procedures and most were justified on the basis of patient request or appropriate clinical indications. Among 108 survivors, the number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient at 12 months after ACP completion was half those seen in the 12 months before ACP completion, whereas hospital days per patient decreased by 25%. What are the implications for practitioners? Encouraging patients with progressive chronic disease to complete an ACP reduces their risk of receiving care they do not want, reflected in decreased use of hospital care. Preferences stated in ACPs are mostly stable over time and, if changed, tend to become more conservative in terms of CPR. Conversely, preferences stated in the ACP do not, as circumstances change, bind patients or clinicians to withholding care that relieves symptoms or prevents major morbidity in the short term.

A Retrospective Analysis of Characteristics Favouring In-Hospital Resuscitation Plan Completion, Their Timing, and Associated Outcomes

Death and Do-Not-resuscitate Order in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Three-Year Retrospective Study in the Chinese Mainland

Characterising Trends in the Initiation, Timing, and Completion of Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) Plans: Retrospective Analysis of Routine Data from a Large UK Hospital Trust

The impact of language on the interpretation of resuscitation clinical care plans by doctors. A mixed methods study

Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate document completion among patients hospitalized in geriatric ward

Resuscitation (un-)wanted: Does anyone care? A retrospective real data analysis

Engaging in resuscitation status conversations in psychiatry: A qualitative study of nurses' perspectives

1720 Frailty and the impact of Electronic Advance Care Planning records on readmission rates and location of end of life care

Assessing concordance between patient preferences in advance care plans and in-hospital care

Prior Advanced Care Planning and Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department of a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Association of advance care planning with hospital use and costs at the end of life: a population-based retrospective cohort study

General Surgery Resuscitation Preference Documentation: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Hospital rapid response team and patients with life-limiting illness: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

An evaluation of the contents of advance care plans and their use in patients admitted to a public hospital

Advance care planning uptake among patients with severe lung disease: a randomised patient preference trial of a nurse-led, facilitated advance care planning intervention

Correlation between hospital rates of survival to discharge and long-term survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest: Insights from Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry

Hospital length of stay, do not resuscitate orders, and survival for post-cardiac arrest patients in Michigan: A study for the CARES Surveillance Group

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

The Association Between Timely Documentation of Advance Care Planning, Hospital Care Consumption and Place of Death: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Quality of Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care and Transfers to Hospital at the End Of Life

Surviving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The important role of bystander interventions