Abstract:WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Discussion and documentation of a patient's resuscitation status are essential aspects of any hospital admission, and yet, they seldomly occur in psychiatry. Nurses play an important role in resuscitation status determination by being an information broker, supporter and advocate. Persons with mental illness may be competent to engage in the determination of their resuscitation status and deserve the same respect and autonomy as other patients during this process. There are no published qualitative studies exploring healthcare providers experiences in initiating resuscitation status conversations in the psychiatric setting. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: An in-depth qualitative understanding of the complexity of resuscitation status determination in psychiatry. The shared experiences of nurses enacting their role in resuscitation status determination with patients admitted to psychiatry. The challenges of implementing a 'one-size fits all' approach to resuscitation status policies, and the ways in which depression and/or suicidal ideation influence the process. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Role clarity and improved communication between providers about resuscitation status determination in psychiatry are needed. Hospital policies for resuscitation status determination must account for the psychiatric context to ensure patients' goals of care are known and upheld. Nurses working in psychiatry should initiate and more readily engage in resuscitation status conversations. ABSTRACT: Introduction Patients with mental illness experience stigma and marginalization, which affects the quality of their health care. In most settings, end-of-life decisions, including goals of care, must be discussed with all patients upon hospital admission, including determining cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences in the event of a medical emergency. Despite this requirement, these conversations do not routinely occur in inpatient psychiatry. By default, patients become a 'full code status', mandating life-sustaining interventions. Aim To explore how and why resuscitation status conversations occur, or do not occur, in inpatient psychiatry from the perspectives of healthcare providers. Method Qualitative descriptive study using focus groups with nurses working in psychiatry. Results Nurses' experiences with initiating and engaging in resuscitation status conversations related to Working in Psychiatry, which represents the current practices and the participants' views of the nursing role; Caring for Psychiatric Patients, which describes how fluctuating competency and suicidality influence determination; and The Influence of Physical Health Status, which details how differences in physical health status affect how healthcare providers engage in resuscitation status determination. Discussion Although the importance of completing resuscitation status conversations with patients admitted to psychiatry was expressed by participants, they seldomly occur. There is ambiguity about when and how to determine patient wishes. Implications for practice Tailored strategies are needed to ensure patients' rights to self-determination are upheld when they are admitted to psychiatry. Nurses working in this setting would benefit from education, training and support to adequately initiate and engage in these conversations.

The impact of language on the interpretation of resuscitation clinical care plans by doctors. A mixed methods study

A Retrospective Analysis of Characteristics Favouring In-Hospital Resuscitation Plan Completion, Their Timing, and Associated Outcomes

Language interpretation and translation in emergency care: A scoping review protocol

Engaging in resuscitation status conversations in psychiatry: A qualitative study of nurses' perspectives

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

Are completed ReSPECT plans facilitating person-centred care? An evaluation of completed plans in UK general practice

Characterising Trends in the Initiation, Timing, and Completion of Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) Plans: Retrospective Analysis of Routine Data from a Large UK Hospital Trust

Views and perceptions of advanced life support practitioners on initiating, withholding and terminating resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Emergency Medical Services of South Africa

Prehospital Providers' Perspectives about Online Medical Direction in Emergency End-of-Life Decision-Making

Development of a video-based education and process change intervention to improve advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making

Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care--from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol

Team communication patterns in emergency resuscitation: a mixed methods qualitative analysis

Improving communication in the emergency department

The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study

Using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) in UK general practice: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of general practitioners, community-based nurses, care home staff, patients and their relatives

Resuscitation (un-)wanted: Does anyone care? A retrospective real data analysis

Examining Barriers and Motivations to Speak up on Medical Errors in a Simulated Clinical Emergency: A Mixed-Methods Study

Speech recognition technology in prehospital documentation: A scoping review

Voices from the 'resus room': An integrative review of the resuscitation experiences of nurses

1909 Evaluation of awareness and implementation of DNACPR decisions in trauma and orthopaedic Surgery

Aligning patient values and code status: Choice of Diction's Effect (CODE) study