Abstract:Socially and environmentally responsible investing is becoming the benchmark in financial markets. Promoting emerging industries' environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG) ratings are increasingly becoming the consensus of multinational green financial institutions, investors, and governments. This study employs 3100 panel data from 2014 to 2019 to conduct empirical research on green innovation, ESG indicators, and the financial performance of China's Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) listed companies. Based on the "causal steps approach", we adopt the Sobel–goodman and Bootstrap test to explore the partial mediation effect of ESG indicators. Moreover, when testing the interactive effect of endogeneity, instrumental variables combined with two-stage least squares (2SLS) and a general method of moments (GMM) system are applied in the dynamic panel for robustness. Combing with the approach of ESG factors-integrated and ESG factors-embedded regression models, we find that: (1) Green innovation can significantly improve the ESG scores of GEM listed companies. (2) Both green innovation and ESG performance can improve the financial performances of GEM listed companies, and ESG performance plays an indirect mediating role in the promotion of green innovation on financial performance. (3) Both political connection strength and regional innovation capabilities can negatively moderate the promotion of green innovation on financial performance, and moderating the effect of corporate political connections is more significant than the regional innovation. This study expands the research on the effectiveness of ESG indices and green innovation from the view of micro-GEM companies, providing policy enlightenment for the sustainable development of emerging industries. Our findings provide noteworthy implications for regulators, academicians and practitioners interested in exploring green innovation, ESG rating and financial performance. In addition, providing regulators and the board of directors with insights into the company's and country's future growth prospects.

Green Business Model and Green Media Coverage for a Successful Initial Public Offering: Evidence from the Korean Firms

Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea

Do Higher-Rated or Enhancing ESG of Firms Enhance Their Long–Term Sustainability? Evidence from Market Returns in Korea

Analysis of ESG Management in KOSPI Listed Companies: Focusing on the Relationship Between Environmental and Financial Performance

Is sustainability rating material to the market?

Are Initial Public Offerings Significant to Firm Performance in an Emerging Stock Market? Evidence from China

Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies

Effect of venture capital and government support on the performance of venture firms in Korea

Freshen up before going public: Do environmental, social, and governance factors affect firms' appearance during the initial public offering?

Greening the Supply Chain: Drivers and Outcomes in the Korean Manufacturing Industry

Do green concerns promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from Chinese stock exchange interactive platforms

The Impact of Firms' Environmental, Social, and Governancial Factors for Sustainability on Their Stock Returns and Values

Association between Earnings Announcement Behaviors and ESG Performances

ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings

Are green IPOs priced differently? Evidence from China

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

The Impact Of Green Bond Issuance And Esg Performance On Firm Profitability: Evidence From Listed Companies In China, South Korea And Thiland

Does Investor Attention Affect Corporate Greenwashing? Evidence from China

One in the Same? Unpacking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and ESG in South Korea