FBI asks scientists for trust in taking anti-Asian bias seriously

Neil Savage

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01704-2

IF: 64.8

2024-06-08

Nature

Abstract:At public forum, US investigators seek to repair damage from China Initiative with researchers of Asian descent. At public forum, US investigators seek to repair damage from China Initiative with researchers of Asian descent.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Differences Between Citizens and Criminal Justice Officials in China

Ming Hu,Mengyan Dai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813505233

2013-01-01

Criminology & Criminal Justice

Abstract:This article examines citizens’ confidence in the Chinese criminal justice system, with data from the surveys collected in three provincial capitals with a random sampling strategy in 2007 and 2008. Multivariate analyses are conducted, and follow-up questions are explored with a comparative approach to assess the differences between public perceptions and the views of criminal justice officials within the current social context. The sample sizes for citizens and officials were 217 and 90, respectively. Findings show that the majority of citizens and officials believed that there was a lack of confidence in the Chinese criminal justice system, as demonstrated in the recent ‘anger-venting’ events. This finding is inconsistent with the limited empirical literature on public attitudes in China. The important factors such as perceptions of fairness, corruption and extortion of confessions are explored, and policy implications are discussed.
Caught in the Crossfire: Fears of Chinese-American Scientists

Yu Xie,Xihong Lin,Ju Li,Qian He,Junming Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.10642

2022-09-23

Abstract:The US leadership in science and technology has greatly benefitted from immigrants from other countries, most notably from China in the recent decades. However, feeling the pressure of potential federal investigation since the 2018 launch of the China Initiative under the Trump administration, Chinese-origin scientists in the US now face higher incentives to leave the US and lower incentives to apply for federal grants. Analyzing data pertaining to institutional affiliations of more than 2.3 million scientific papers, we find a steady increase in the return migration of Chinese-origin scientists from the US back to China. We also conducted a survey of Chinese-origin scientists employed by US universities in tenure or tenure-track positions (n=1300), with results revealing general feelings of fear and anxiety that lead them to consider leaving the US and/or stop applying for federal grants.

Physics and Society,Digital Libraries,Applications
NIH director offers support for Asian researchers

Jocelyn Kaiser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads6029

IF: 56.9

2024-08-25

Science

Abstract:Six years into agency's efforts to curtail foreign interference, some say it should apologize

multidisciplinary sciences
Why the US border remains 'a place of terror' for Chinese researchers

Virginia Gewin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00546-2

IF: 64.8

2024-02-27

Nature

Abstract:Two years after the end of the controversial China Initiative, academics describe being treated like spies, a loss of talent and a chilling atmosphere that is stifling science. Two years after the end of the controversial China Initiative, academics describe being treated like spies, a loss of talent and a chilling atmosphere that is stifling science.

multidisciplinary sciences
Elite researchers in China say they had 'no choice' but to commit misconduct

Smriti Mallapaty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01697-y

IF: 64.8

2024-06-11

Nature

Abstract:Anonymous interviewees say they engaged in unethical behaviour to protect their jobs — although others say study presents an overly negative view. Anonymous interviewees say they engaged in unethical behaviour to protect their jobs — although others say study presents an overly negative view.

multidisciplinary sciences
Halt the Ongoing Decoupling and Reboot US-China Scientific Collaboration

Li Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101521

IF: 3.7

2024-01-01

Journal of Informetrics

Abstract:This study reveals that, following bilateral reduced international visitation and academic exchange, Sino-American scientific collaboration is positioned at a turning point in a declining course. American international students originating from China have declined by nearly 22 %, and American students studying in China plummeted to 1.8 % of the number in 2018–2019. US-China interdependence in scientific collaboration has also reduced remarkably. At the same time, the concentration of influential research collaborated between the United States and China is consistently greater than both nations’ research outputs. Following the discussion of possible substitutes and the roles of American and Chinese researchers in global basic science and emerging issues, I argue that the two nations are so entwined in scientific collaboration that an adversarial rivalry perspective misses much of reality. In the face of rising uncertainties and global disasters, humanity does not have time to waste on nationalistic competitions. It is time for visionary leadership from both countries to promote intellectual exchange and scientific collaboration to address pressing global challenges.
A Role for Funders in Fostering China’s Research Integrity

Li Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7992

IF: 56.9

2022-01-01

Science

Abstract:Despite recent progress, challenges remain.
Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System

Li Tang,Linan Wang,Guangyuan Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00459-9

2023-11-22

Abstract:As stewards of public money, government funding agencies have the obligation and responsibility to uphold the integrity of funded research. Despite an increasing amount of empirical studies examining research-related misconduct, a majority of these studies focus on retracted publications. How agencies spot funding-relevant wrongdoing and what sanctions the offenders face remain largely unexplored. This is particularly true for public funding agencies in emerging science powers. To amend this oversight, we retrieved and analyzed all publicized investigation results from China's largest basic research funding agency over the period from 2005 to 2021. Our findings reveal that both the "police patrol" and "fire alarm" approaches are used to identify misconduct and deter funding-related fraud in China. The principal triggers for investigations are journal article retractions, whistleblowing, and plagiarism detection software. Among the six funding-related misconduct types publicized and punished, the top three are: (1) fraudulent papers, (2) information fabrication and/or falsification in the research proposal, and (3) proposal plagiarism. The most common administrative sanctions are debarment and reclamation of grants. This article argues that more systematic research and cooperation among stakeholders is needed to cultivate research integrity in emerging science powers like China. Specific training and education should be provided for young scientists to help them avoid the pitfall of academic misconduct.
Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China

Kaiping Chen,Yepeng Jin,Anqi Shao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077019

2022-01-01

Social Media + Society

Abstract:Misinformation and intergroup bias are two pathologies challenging informed citizenship. This article examines how identity language is used in misinformation and debunking messages about controversial science on the Chinese digital public spheres and their impact on how the public engage with science. We collected an 8-year time series dataset of public discussion ( N = 6,039) on one of the most controversial science issues in China (GMO) from a popular Q&A platform, Zhihu. We found that both misinformation and debunking messages use a substantial amount of group identity languages when discussing the controversial science issue, which we define as science factionalism—discussion about science is divided by factions that are formed upon science attitudes. We found that posts that use science factionalism receive more digital votes and comments, even among the science-savvy community in China. Science factionalism also increases the use of negativity in public discourse. We discussed the implications of how science factionalism interacts with the digital attention economy to affect public engagement with science misinformation.

communication
Rooting out scientific misconduct

Ivan Oransky,Barbara Redman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn9352

IF: 56.9

2024-01-12

Science

Abstract:Scientific misconduct is an issue rife with controversy, from its forms and definitions to the policies that guide how allegations are handled. A survey published nearly 15 years ago reported that 2% of researchers said they had fabricated or falsified data in their published work. This is not just an academic issue. Fake data promote ineffective or even dangerous treatments, for example, and thwart the discovery of real solutions for society. In the United States, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is tasked with rooting out misconduct in research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Last October, ORI proposed changes to how it functions. The agency's recommendations—the first since 2005—have evoked mixed reactions, but the real problem is that ORI is underfunded and lacks the resources and authority needed to make a difference. Unless its charter is revised by Congress, the ORI can sadly do little more than tinker at the edges of scientific fraud.

multidisciplinary sciences
The future of US-China relations: a scientific investigation

Belal E. Baaquie,Peter Richmond,Bertrand M. Roehner,Qing-hai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.06719

2019-01-29

Abstract:In earlier centuries kings and governments employed astrologists to help them take the best decisions. Present-day governments no longer employ astrologists but still have no clear analytical tool to replace them. Over the past two decades we have developed a methodology for the scientific investigation of recurrent historical events. It consists in two steps. (i) Identification and comparison of historical episodes driven by a common mechanism. (ii) Under the reasonable assumption that what has happened several times in the past is likely to happen again, one then derives testable predictions. This of course is nothing other than the protocol used in experimental science when exploring new phenomena. We believe such a tool can give decision makers much better insight. In the present paper we illustrate this analysis by considering challenges, that span more than a century, to US hegemony in the Pacific. The outcomes suggest that it is only through the sidelining of one of the contenders that the confrontation will end. At the time of writing (late 2018) early evidence of this confrontation is already visible at three levels. (i) Growing US concerns for domestic security that are leading to a new form of McCarthyism. (ii) Political instability due to China-US polarization in several Asian countries as well as in the countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative. (iii) Tension and sanctions in procurement and trade.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Physics and Society
Unethical studies on Chinese minority groups are being retracted — but not fast enough, critics say

Dyani Lewis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00170-0

IF: 64.8

2024-01-25

Nature

Abstract:Campaigners who want scrutiny of biometrics research on Uyghurs, Tibetans and other groups are frustrated by slow progress. Campaigners who want scrutiny of biometrics research on Uyghurs, Tibetans and other groups are frustrated by slow progress.

multidisciplinary sciences
"Asian" Is a Problematic Category in Research and Practice: Insights From the Bamboo Ceiling

Jackson G. Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241283406

IF: 7.867

2024-10-18

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract:Current Directions in Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. This article spotlights a widespread problem in research and practice: Asians are commonly categorized as a monolithic group in the United States. Regarding research, my 24-year archival analysis of Psychological Science shows that most U.S. studies did not specify which Asian subgroup(s) were examined. Regarding practice, my analysis of the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) webpages and latest diversity reports of S&P 100 companies finds that none of them differentiated between Asian subgroups. Such use of the generic category "Asian" is problematic because it masks important differences among Asian subgroups: (a) Of all ethnic groups in the United States, socioeconomic inequality among Asian subgroups is the highest and fastest growing; (b) U.S. studies show that East Asians (e.g., ethnic Chinese)—but not South Asians (e.g., ethnic Indians)—experience a "bamboo ceiling" in consequential contexts, including leadership attainment, academic performance in law and business schools, and starting salaries. Thus, lumping Asians together can obscure the challenges faced by certain Asian subgroups and jeopardize the attention and resources they need. More broadly, this article demonstrates the importance of differentiating between ethnic subgroups in research (e.g., theorization, surveys, and data analysis) and practice (e.g., diversity reports) to foster DEI.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Trust in Researchers As Fiduciaries, but Not Equitable Brokers, Linked to Willingness for Research Participation

William Hu,Stephanie Bergren,Dana Dychtwald,Yiming Ma,XinQi Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4125696

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Objective: To assess attitudes towards biomedical researchers and impact on willingness to participate in common types of research in a racially/ethnically diverse group NJ adults recruited from community-based encounters. Design: Adults attending community-based events jointly hosted by Rutgers University between October 2020 and February 2022 were prospectively asked to complete an anonymous survey in English or one of the common languages (e.g., Spanish, Mandarin Chinese).Setting: Community-based health fairs, health screening, and cultural events in NJ.Participant: 293 adults (72% women, 38% older than 54 years of age) self-reporting as Hispanic (n=102), Black (n=49), Chinese (n=48), other Asian (n=53), and White (n=41) race/ethnicity.Main outcomes and measures: A survey consisting of 12 Likert Scale questions related to trust in biomedical researchers (according to participant safety, equity, transparency, etc), and willingness to consider participation in eight common research categories (health-related survey, medical record review, blood collection, genetic analysis, medication study, study involving an overnight stay, study involving an equipment, and study without payment/remuneration). Results: Three factors related to trust in researchers were identified: researchers as fiduciaries for research participants, racial/ethnic equity in research, and transparency in research. Chinese respondents were most likely to have low trust in researchers to prioritize participant safety and interests, and White respondents were most likely to believe researchers treated all participants equitably. Chinese respondents’ low trust in researchers mediated their low interest in participating in research involving more than health-related surveys, while Hispanic respondents expressed high willingness to participate in research involving blood and genetic analysis despite low trust in researchers to behave equitably.Conclusion and relevance: Mistrust in researchers is not universal nor identical among different NJ racial/ethnic groups, with variable impact on each group’s willingness for research participation.
Recent insights into the impact of geopolitical tensions: Quantifying the structure of computer science professors of Chinese descent in the United States

Yongzhen Wang

2024-11-25

Abstract:The geopolitical tensions between China and the US have dramatically reshaped the American scientific workforce's landscape. To gain a deeper understanding of this circumstance, this study selects the discipline of computer science as a representative case for empirical investigations, aiming to explore the current situation of US-based Chinese-descent computer science professors. One thousand and seventy-eight tenured or tenure-track professors of Chinese descent from the computer science departments of 108 prestigious US universities are profiled, in order to quantify their structure primarily along gender, schooling, and expertise lines. The findings presented in this paper suggest that China-US tensions have made it more difficult for the US higher education system to retain valuable computer science professors of Chinese descent, particularly those in their mid-to late career stages, and that nearly 50% of the existing professors have less than seven years of faculty experience. In addition, the deterioration in faculty retention varies across fields of research, education backgrounds, and gender groups. Specifically, among the professors we are concerned about, those who do not work on AI or Systems, those who lack study experience at US universities, and those who are women, are underrepresented, albeit in different forms and to varying degrees. In a nutshell, the focal professoriate has not only shrunk in size, as has been widely reported, but also lost some of its diversity in structure. This paper has policy implications for the mobility of scientific talent, especially in an era of geopolitical challenges.

Computers and Society
Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative

Christopher Grondin,Yali Cong,Nahid Keshavarzi,Michael E. Geisser,Joseph C. Kolars,Raymond J. Hutchinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1920014

2022-01-01

Abstract:Variances in perceived standards regarding research integrity appear to exist between China and the U.S. An established joint institute for translational and clinical research between one Chinese and one U.S. health system provides a valuable venue in which to evaluate these perceptions better. We therefore undertook a survey of 209 physicians at the two institutions in 2013-14. The vast majority of physicians from both institutions understood the necessity of obtaining informed consent from research participants, the need to provide a description of the risks of participation, and the voluntary nature of research participation. However, there were differences in responses between the two sites in willingness to report plagiarism (U.S. 95.65% vs. Chinese 40.21%; p < .0001) and data falsification (U.S. 100% vs. Chinese 81.25%; p < .0001) and in willingness to attend biomedical industry-funded promotional events (U.S. 11.0% vs. Chinese 74.0%; p < .0001). When planning to conduct collaborative clinical research across cultures, particularly when uncertainty regarding the similarity of research cultures exists, exploration of cultural and ethical norms in research may be informative regarding educational needs and the risks of research and academic misconduct.
The Moral Filter of Patriotic Prejudice: How Americans View Chinese in the COVID-19 Era.

Qian He,Yu Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212183119

IF: 11.1

2022-01-01

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:About one in six Asian Americans have fallen victim to anti-Asian racism during the COVID-19 pandemic [J. Lee, K. Ramakrishnan, aapidata.com/blog/discrimination-survey-2022/]. By examining anti-Asian racism in the United States primarily as a domestic issue, most prior studies have overlooked the connections between shifting US-China relations and Americans' prejudices against the Chinese in China and, by extension, East Asian Americans. This study investigates the patterns and perceptual bases of nationality-based prejudices against Chinese amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Our nationally representative online survey experiment reveals that Americans assess a hypothetical Chinese person in China as inferior in multiple social and psychological characteristics to an otherwise identical Japanese person in Japan or East Asian American. Furthermore, subjects who perceive China as more threatening to America's national interests assess Chinese more negatively, especially in terms of trustworthiness and morality, suggesting that perceived China threats propel Americans' negative stereotypes about Chinese. A contextual analysis further indicates that counties with a higher share of Trump voters in 2016 tend to perceive all East Asian-origin groups similarly as a racial outgroup. By contrast, residents in predominantly Democrat-voting counties tend to perceive Chinese in China more negatively relative to Asian Americans, despite broadly viewing East Asians more favorably. Overall, this study underscores the often-overlooked relationships between the prevailing anti-Asian sentiments in the United States and the US-China geopolitical tensions and America's domestic political polarization.
Policies on Conflict of Interest at US Scientific Research Institution: Appearance, Actuality and Controversy

WANG Pu-sheng,ZHOU Ying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2005.03.016

2005-01-01

Abstract:The appearance of policies on conflict of interest in the science is a measure which made by scientific research institution and management organization to preventing the harm that incured by conflict of interest to the objectivity of science. In America most of research institution and some of magazines have already adopted such policies on conflict of interest despite its content somewhat different. Though the measure of making the policy of conflict of interest was wildly criticized, its justice was cannot be denied because it was established on the bases of a great deal of facts.
Public opinion, racial bias and labour market outcomes in the USA

Kaveh Majlesi,Silvia Prina,Paul Sullivan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01904-w

Abstract:Here we study the role of negative shifts in public opinion in the economic lives of under-represented racial groups by investigating sudden changes in views towards Asian people following the anti-Chinese rhetoric that emerged with the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated changes in employment status and earnings in the US labour market. Using data from the Current Population Survey, we find that, unlike other under-represented groups, Asian workers in occupations or industries with a higher likelihood of face-to-face interactions before the pandemic were more likely to become unemployed afterwards. While widespread along the political spectrum, negative shifts in the perceived favourability of Asian people, and not of other under-represented groups, were much stronger among those who voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and could have been more influenced by the anti-Asian rhetoric.
The Role of Chinese-American Scientists in China-US Scientific Collaboration: A Study in Nanotechnology

Xianwen Wang,Shenmeng Xu,Di Liu,Yongxia Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.1129

2014-10-05

Digital Libraries

Abstract:In this paper, we use bibliometric methods and social network analysis to analyze the pattern of China-US scientific collaboration on individual level in nanotechnology. Results show that Chinese-American scientists have been playing an important role in China-US scientific collaboration. We find that China-US collaboration in nanotechnology mainly occurs between Chinese and Chinese-American scientists. In the co-authorship network, Chinese-American scientists tend to have higher betweenness centrality. Moreover, the series of polices implemented by the Chinese government to recruit oversea experts seems to contribute a lot to China-US scientific collaboration.

FBI asks scientists for trust in taking anti-Asian bias seriously

Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Differences Between Citizens and Criminal Justice Officials in China

Caught in the Crossfire: Fears of Chinese-American Scientists

NIH director offers support for Asian researchers

Why the US border remains 'a place of terror' for Chinese researchers

Elite researchers in China say they had 'no choice' but to commit misconduct

Halt the Ongoing Decoupling and Reboot US-China Scientific Collaboration

A Role for Funders in Fostering China’s Research Integrity

Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System

Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China

Rooting out scientific misconduct

The future of US-China relations: a scientific investigation

Unethical studies on Chinese minority groups are being retracted — but not fast enough, critics say

"Asian" Is a Problematic Category in Research and Practice: Insights From the Bamboo Ceiling

Trust in Researchers As Fiduciaries, but Not Equitable Brokers, Linked to Willingness for Research Participation

Recent insights into the impact of geopolitical tensions: Quantifying the structure of computer science professors of Chinese descent in the United States

Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative

The Moral Filter of Patriotic Prejudice: How Americans View Chinese in the COVID-19 Era.

Policies on Conflict of Interest at US Scientific Research Institution: Appearance, Actuality and Controversy

Public opinion, racial bias and labour market outcomes in the USA

The Role of Chinese-American Scientists in China-US Scientific Collaboration: A Study in Nanotechnology