Reintroduction affects demographic rates but not their interannual correlations in an endangered shrub

Jesús Villellas,Rut Sánchez de Dios,Felipe Domínguez Lozano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14802
IF: 6.865
2024-10-24
Journal of Applied Ecology
Abstract:Our study shows that stressful conditions may trigger individual‐level trade‐offs in resource allocation and population‐level compensation among demographic rates. Demographic shifts arising from reintroductions in different environmental conditions may be considered by managers as a potential mechanism of resilience against environmental change. Finally, the similarity in rate correlations among sites suggests that information about correlations, which can be relevant when focusing conservation efforts, may be extrapolated from natural to reintroduced populations. This might be particularly reliable for species where rate correlations are demographically influential, such as those living under generally stressful conditions, or lacking buffering mechanisms for demographic variation. Reintroducing endangered species constitutes an important conservation tool. The performance of reintroduced populations is commonly assessed through mean demographic rates (survival, growth, reproduction and fecundity), but rate correlations are less studied despite their role in extinction risk and trait evolution. In our study, we reintroduced the endangered shrub Vella pseudocytisus subsp. paui in two locations in Spain and compared its demographic performance to that of two natural populations to assess reintroduction success. In both natural and reintroduced sites, we selected sub‐locations with presumably more favourable (clay) vs. more stressful (gypsum) soil conditions. We monitored a total of 1269 individuals in natural (12 years) and reintroduced populations (6 years) and compared their mean demographic rates and the within‐individual rate correlations between years. In clay substrate, mean demographic rates of the natural and the reintroduced population were similar, suggesting a successful reintroduction. In contrast, the reintroduced population in gypsum showed higher reproduction and fecundity than the natural population, but lower survival and growth. Contrary to mean demographic performance, interannual correlations among demographic rates did not vary between natural and reintroduced populations. While reproduction in a given year was positively correlated with later growth and later reproduction, growth in a given year had some negative consequences in subsequent plant performance, especially in gypsum substrate. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that stressful conditions may trigger individual‐level trade‐offs in resource allocation and population‐level compensation among demographic rates. Demographic shifts arising from reintroductions in different environmental conditions may be considered by managers as a potential mechanism of resilience against environmental change. Finally, the similarity in rate correlations among sites suggests that information about correlations, which can be relevant when focusing conservation efforts, may be extrapolated from natural to reintroduced populations. This might be particularly reliable for species where rate correlations are demographically influential, such as those living under generally stressful conditions, or lacking buffering mechanisms for demographic variation. Resumen La reintroducción de especies amenazadas constituye una importante herramienta de conservación. El desempeño de las poblaciones reintroducidas se evalúa con frecuencia a través de valores promedio de tasas demográficas (supervivencia, crecimiento, reproducción, fecundidad), pero las correlaciones entre tasas son menos estudiadas, a pesar de su papel en el riesgo de extinción y la evolución de rasgos biológicos. En nuestro estudio, reintrodujimos el arbusto amenazado Vella pseudocytisus subsp. paui en dos localidades en España y comparamos su comportamiento demográfico con el de dos poblaciones naturales para evaluar el éxito de la reintroducción. En ambos sitios, naturales y reintroducidos, seleccionamos sub‐localidades con condiciones de suelo presumiblemente más favorables (lutita) vs. estresantes (yeso). Monitorizamos un total de 1269 individuos en poblaciones naturales (12 años) y reintroducidas (6 años), y comparamos sus tasas demográficas promedio y las correlaciones intra‐individuales en las tasas entre años. En el sustrato de lutita, las tasas demográficas promedio de la población natural y la reintroducida fueron similares, lo que sugiere una reintroducción exitosa. En contraste, la población reintroducida en yeso mostró mayor reproducción y fecundidad que la población natural, pero menor supervivencia y crecimiento. A diferencia del comportamiento demográfico promedio, las correlaciones interanuales entre tasas demográficas no variaron entre las poblaciones naturales y reintroducidas. Mientras que la reproducción en un año determinado se correlacionó positivamente con el crecimiento posterior y la reproducción posterior, el crecimiento en un año determinado tuvo algunas consecuencias negativas en el rendimien -Abstract Truncated-
biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?