Abstract:While computer modeling and simulation are crucial for understanding scientometrics, their practical use in literature remains somewhat limited. In this study, we establish a joint coauthorship and citation network using preferential attachment. As papers get published, we update the coauthorship network based on each paper's author list, representing the collaborative team behind it. This team is formed considering the number of collaborations each author has, and we introduce new authors at a fixed probability, expanding the coauthorship network. Simultaneously, as each paper cites a specific number of references, we add an equivalent number of citations to the citation network upon publication. The likelihood of a paper being cited depends on its existing citations, fitness value, and age. Then we calculate the journal impact factor and h-index, using them as examples of scientific impact indicators. After thorough validation, we conduct case studies to analyze the impact of different parameters on the journal impact factor and h-index. The findings reveal that increasing the reference number N or reducing the paper's lifetime {\theta} significantly boosts the journal impact factor and average h-index. On the other hand, enlarging the team size m without introducing new authors or decreasing the probability of newcomers p notably increases the average h-index. In conclusion, it is evident that various parameters influence scientific impact indicators, and their interpretation can be manipulated by authors. Thus, exploring the impact of these parameters and continually refining scientific impact indicators are essential. The modeling and simulation method serves as a powerful tool in this ongoing process, and the model can be easily extended to include other scientific impact indicators and scenarios.

Quantifying hierarchy in scientific teams

Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation

Team Power and Hierarchy: Understanding Team Success

Quantifying team chemistry in scientific collaboration

Team careers in science: formation, composition and success of persistent collaborations

The Impact of Heterogeneous Shared Leadership in Scientific Teams

Team formation and team impact: The balance between team freshness and repeat collaboration

Mutual Influence in Citation and Cooperation Patterns

Analysis of effects to scientific impact indicators based on the coevolution of coauthorship and citation networks

An Evolving Model for Hypergraph-Structure-Based Scientific Collaboration Networks

Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguish prestige from popularity

China's Biomedical Scientific Leadership Flows and the Role of Proximity.

Collective credit allocation in science

Persistent Hierarchy in Contemporary International Collaboration

Contributorship in scientific collaborations: The perspective of contribution-based byline orders

Research Leadership Flow Determinants and the Role of Proximity in Research Collaborations Networks

Higher-order structures of local collaboration networks are associated with individual scientific productivity

Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution

Co-contributorship Network and Division of Labor in Individual Scientific Collaborations

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers