Abstract:BACKGROUND. Automated software-based Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on unenhanced CT is associated with clinical outcomes after acute stroke. However, encephalomalacia or white matter hyperintensities (WMH) may result in a falsely low automated ASPECTS if such findings are interpreted as early ischemia. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of encephalomalacia and WMH on the automated ASPECTS in patients with acute stroke, in comparison with the radiologist-derived ASPECTS and clinical outcomes. METHODS. This retrospective three-center study included 459 patients (322 men, 137 women; median age, 65 years) with acute ischemic stroke treated by IV thrombolysis who underwent baseline unenhanced CT within 6 hours after symptom onset and MRI within 24 hours after treatment. ASPECTS was determined by automated software and by three radiologists in consensus. Presence of encephalomalacia and extent of WMH (categorized using the modified Scheltens score [mSS]) were also determined using MRI. Kappa coefficients were used to compare the ASPECTS between automated- and radiologist-derived methods. Multivariable logistic regression analyses and ROC analyses were performed to explore the predictive utility of the baseline ASPECTS for unfavorable clinical outcomes (90-day modified Rankin score of 3-6) after thrombolysis. RESULTS. The median automated software-derived ASPECTS was 9, and the median radiologist consensus-derived ASPECTS was 10. Agreement between automated and radiologist-consensus ASPECTS, expressed as kappa, was 0.68, though agreement was 0.76 in patients without encephalomalacia and 0.08 in patients with encephalomalacia. In patients without encephalomalacia, agreement decreased as the mSS increased (e.g., 0.78 in subgroup with mSS < 10 vs 0.19 in subgroup with mSS > 20). By anatomic region, agreement was highest for the lateral middle cerebral artery (κ, 0.52) and lowest for the internal capsule (κ, 0.18). In multivariable analyses, both the automated (odds ratio, 0.69) and the radiologist-consensus (odds ratio, 0.57) ASPECTS independently predicted an unfavorable clinical outcome. For unfavorable outcome, the automated ASPECTS had an AUC of 0.70, sensitivity of 60.4%, and specificity of 70.7%, whereas the radiologist-consensus ASPECTS had an AUC of 0.72, sensitivity of 60.4%, and specificity of 80.5%. CONCLUSION. Presence of encephalomalacia or extensive WMH results in a lower automated than radiologist-consensus ASPECTS, which may impact predictive utility of automated ASPECTS. CLINICAL IMPACT. When using an automated software-derived ASPECTS, radiologists should manually confirm the score in patients with encephalomalacia or extensive leukoencephalopathy.

Comparison of consistency in acute stroke: Automated ASPECT score software tools and manual consensus scores

Validation of two automated ASPECTS software on non-contrast computed tomography scans of patients with acute ischemic stroke

Automated ASPECTS in acute ischemic stroke: comparison of the overall scores and Hounsfield unit values of two software packages and radiologists with different levels of experience

Comparison of automated and manual DWI-ASPECTS in acute ischemic stroke: total and region-specific assessment

Comparison of the Performance Between Frontier ASPECTS Software and Different Levels of Radiologists on Assessing CT Examinations of Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients

Discrepancies in ASPECTS obtained by artificial intelligence and experts: Associated factors and prognostic implications

Region‐specific interobserver agreement of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score: A meta‐analysis

Impact of Encephalomalacia and White Matter Hyperintensities on ASPECTS in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of Automated- and Radiologist-Derived Scores.

An automated ASPECTS method with atlas-based segmentation

Total and Regional ASPECT Score for Non-Contrast CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion: Inter-Rater Agreement and Its Association with the Final Infarction in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Automated ASPECTS calculation may equal the performance of experienced clinicians: a machine learning study based on a large cohort

Deep learning derived automated ASPECTS on non‐contrast CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients

Accuracy and reliability of PBV ASPECTS, CBV ASPECTS and NCCT ASPECTS in acute ischaemic stroke: a matched-pair analysis

Artificial intelligence-driven ASPECTS for the detection of early stroke changes in non-contrast CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deep Learning-Based Automatic ASPECTS Calculation Can Improve Diagnosis Efficiency in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Multicenter Study

COMPARISON OF THE ASPECT SCORING SYSTEM ON NONCONTRAST CT AND ON BRAIN CT ANGIOGRAPHY IN ISCHEMIC STROKE

Age-specific ASPECTS atlas of Chinese subjects across different age groups for assessing acute ischemic stroke

Automated ASPECTS for Multi-Modality CT Predict Infarct Extent and Outcome in Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Artificial Intelligence software to interpret brain computed tomography in patients with stroke: External validation of e‐ASPECTS software

[Combined application of multi-parameter semiquantitative Alberta stroke program early CT score to assess infarction severity in acute ischemic stroke]

Automatic assessment of DWI‐ASPECTS for acute ischemic stroke based on deep learning