Personal identification using frontal sinus coding methods: The effect of mixed image modality comparisons

Patricia R. Avent,Jessica L. Campbell,Heather M. Garvin,Lauren N. Butaric
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15533
2024-05-01
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Abstract:Several code‐based methods have been created for comparing the frontal sinus in skeletal identification scenarios. However, little is known regarding matched‐pair accuracy rates of these methods or how varying image modalities may affect these rates. The goals of this study were to validate the exclusion rates and to establish matched‐pair accuracy rates of two well‐cited coding methods, Cameriere et al. [23] and Tatlisumak et al. [24]. Additionally, individual variables were assessed for consistency in scoring between image modalities. Using a sample of U.S. African American, Native American, and European American females and males (n = 225), we examined individual variable scoring and string codes between two different image modalities (radiographs and CT‐based 3D models). Arcades showed poor scoring consistency between modalities (p
medicine, legal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?