Prediction of 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among community residents in Shanghai, China – a comparative analysis of risk algorithms

Yue Zhang,Qi Zhao,Nawi Ng,Weibing Wang,Na Wang,Yun Qiu,Yuting Yu,Yu Xiang,Shuheng Cui,Meiying Zhu,Yonggen Jiang,Genming Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.04.009
2021-06-01
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background and Aims</h3><p>The accuracy of various 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk models has been debatable. We compared two risk algorithms and explored clustering patterns across different risk stratifications among community residents in Shanghai.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A total of 28,201 residents (aged 40-74 years old) who were free of ASCVD were selected from the Shanghai Survey in China. The 10-year ASCVD risk was estimated by applying the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) and Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China (China-PAR). The agreement was assessed between PCEs and China-PAR using Cohen's kappa statistics.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The mean absolute 10-year ASCVD risk calculated by PCEs and China-PAR was about 10.0% and 6.0%, respectively. PCEs estimated that 44.9% of participants [with a 95% confidence interval (CI):44.0%-45.8%] were at high risk, while China-PAR estimated only 16.7% (95%CI:15.8%-18.0%) were at high risk. In both models, the percentage of high ASCVD risk was higher for participants who were older, men, less educated, current smokers, drinkers and manual workers. Among high-risk individuals, almost all participants (PCEs:90.5%; China-PAR:98.6%) had at least one risk factor; hypertension being the most prevalent. The concordance between PCEs and China-PAR was moderate (kappa:0.428, 95%CI: 0.420-0.434) with a better agreement for women (kappa:0.503,95%CI: 0.493-0.513) than for men (kappa:0.211,95%CI: 0.201-0.221).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The proportion of participants with a 10-year ASCVD high risk predicted by China-PAR was lower than the results of the PCEs. The risk stratifications of the two algorithms were inconsistent in terms of demographic and life-behaviour characteristics.</p>
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,endocrinology & metabolism,nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the accuracy of different 10 - year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk prediction models among community residents in Shanghai, China, and compare the performance of these models in different risk stratifications. Specifically, the study compared the performance of the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) and the Chinese ASCVD Risk Prediction Model (China - PAR) in predicting 10 - year ASCVD risk, and explored the clustering patterns of risk factors in different risk stratifications. ### Research Background and Objectives Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the major chronic non - communicable diseases worldwide, causing approximately 17.9 million deaths each year. In China, with the acceleration of urbanization, population aging, and the popularization of unhealthy lifestyles, the incidence and mortality of CVD are showing an explosive growth trend. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the main types of CVD, accounting for 61% of all CVD deaths. Therefore, early prevention of ASCVD is crucial for dealing with the burden of CVD. ### Methods The study analyzed cross - sectional data from an adult cohort study in the suburbs of Shanghai in eastern China. The study subjects were community residents aged 40 - 74 years, excluding participants who had been diagnosed with coronary heart disease or stroke. The 10 - year ASCVD risk of each individual was estimated using the PCEs and China - PAR models respectively, and the risk prediction results of the two models were compared. ### Main Findings 1. **Risk Distribution**: - The average 10 - year ASCVD risk predicted by the PCEs model was approximately 10.0%, while the average risk predicted by the China - PAR model was 6.0%. - The PCEs model estimated that 44.9% of the participants belonged to the high - risk group, while the China - PAR model estimated that only 16.7% of the participants belonged to the high - risk group. 2. **Gender and Age Differences**: - The risk of men was higher than that of women at all ages. - As age increased, the proportion of the high - risk group gradually increased. 3. **Clustering of Risk Factors**: - In the high - risk group, hypertension was the most common risk factor, followed by overweight, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia. - Almost all participants in the high - risk group had at least one risk factor. 4. **Model Consistency**: - The overall consistency between the PCEs and China - PAR models was moderate (Cohen’s kappa = 0.428), with better consistency in women (kappa = 0.503) and poorer consistency in men (kappa = 0.211). ### Conclusions The study found that the proportion of 10 - year ASCVD high - risk predicted by the China - PAR model was lower than that of the PCEs model. There were inconsistencies in risk stratification between the two models under different demographic and lifestyle characteristics. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate risk assessment model should be based on its robustness and accuracy verification.