Validation of 10-Year Stroke Prediction Scores in a Community-Based Cohort of Chinese Older Adults

Yanlei Zhang,Xianghua Fang,Shaochen Guan,Xiaoguang Wu,Hongjun Liu,Chunxiu Wang,Zhongying Zhang,Xiang Gu,Chunxiao Liu,Jianhua Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00986
IF: 3.4
2020-10-22
Frontiers in Neurology
Abstract:A stroke prediction model based on the Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in China (China-PAR) project was developed. We compared its predictive ability with the revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score (R-FSRS) for 5-year stroke incidence in a community cohort of Chinese adults, namely the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Calibration, discrimination, and recalibration were used to compare the predictive ability between the two prediction models. Category-less net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) values were also assessed. During a mean follow-up duration of 5.1 years, 106 incidents of fatal or non-fatal strokes occurred among 1,203 participants aged 55–84 years. The R-FSRS applied to our cohort underestimated the 5-year risk for stroke in men and women. China-PAR performed better than the R-FSRS in terms of calibration (men, R-FSRS: χ<sup>2</sup>-value 144.2 [<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001], China-PAR: 10.4 [<i>P</i> = 0.238]; women, R-FSRS: 280.1 [<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001], China-PAR: 12.5 [<i>P</i> = 0.129]). In terms of discrimination, R-FSRS and China-PAR models performed modestly in our cohort (C-statistic 0.603 [95% CI: 0.560–0.644] for men using China-PAR and 0.568 [95% CI: 0.524–0.610] using the R-FSRS; the corresponding numbers for women were 0.602 [95% CI: 0.564–0.639] and 0.575 [95% CI: 0.537–0.613). The recalibrated China-PAR model significantly improved the discrimination in C statistics and produced higher category-less NRI and IDI for stroke incidence than the R-FSRS. Although China-PAR fairly estimated stroke risk in our cohort, it did not sufficiently identify adults at high risk of stroke. Caution would be exercised by practitioners in applying the original China-PAR to Chinese older adults. Further studies are needed to develop an adequate prediction model based on the recalibrated China-PAR or to find new risk markers which could upgrade this model.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?