Abstract:Introduction The built environment plays an important role in individuals’ propensity to walk and cycle and local authorities increasingly invest financial resources towards its development. Organisations responsible for the built environment have developed auditing tools as guidelines to inspect routes and identify improvements to support active travel. Methods Using these auditing tools as a starting point, this study developed 21 walking and 25 cycling investment-relevant factors that were embedded into two choice-based survey instruments, respectively. The study used cognitive interview pre-testing to internally validate a preference-based elicitation approach known as Best-Worst Scaling (BWS), which aimed to capture pedestrian and cyclist preferences. We report findings from cognitive interviews (data analysed thematically) with 20 participants (10 pedestrians and 10 cyclists). Results In both sets of interviews, four themes emerged regarding how the participants approached the BWS task and five themes related to the understanding of the factors. The BWS choice tasks required refinement regarding the ‘frame of reference’, ‘travel context’, the ‘decision-making strategy’, and the ‘concrete thinking’ (finding some factors easier to interpret). Additionally, issues with understanding the factors, the wording, ‘overlapping’, negatively phrased factors, and technical jargon all pointed towards the need to refine auditing tools if these were to be introduced in a preference elicitation context. Conclusions This study helps to empirically uncover how citizens interpret infrastructure related aspects of walking and cycling by pointing to nuanced aspects that auditing tools may miss. The findings also helped develop an internally consistent preference elicitation survey-instrument that any local authority can implement to determine which walking and cycling infrastructure investments are a priority in their area.

Explaining the diffusion of Dutch express bikeways through QCA: The importance of pilots, collaboration and external funding

Exploring factors affecting route choice of cyclists: A novel varying-contiguity spatially lagged exogenous modeling approach

Synergizing cycling and transit: Strategic placement of cycling infrastructure to enhance job accessibility

A Road Segment Prioritization Approach for Cycling Infrastructure

Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places)

The Propensity to Cycle Tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning

Bicycle infrastructure: can good design encourage cycling?

The spatio-temporal development of Copenhagen’s bicycle infrastructure 1912–2013

Using shortest path routing to assess cycling networks

Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns

Effects of crowding on route preferences and perceived safety of urban cyclists in the Netherlands

Eliciting citizens’ priorities for active travel infrastructure investments: A qualitative analysis of best-worst scaling experiments

Quantitative modelling of cyclists' route choice behaviour on utilitarian trips based on GPS data: associated factors and behavioural implications

Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling

Urban bicycle tourism: path dependencies and innovation in Greater Copenhagen

Demand-driven design of bicycle infrastructure networks for improved urban bikeability

How does public-private collaboration reinvent? A comparative analysis of urban bicycle-sharing policy diffusion in China

Motivations and Strategies for Bicycle Planning in Rural, Suburban, and Low-Density Communities: The Need for New Best Practices

Evaluating the bikeability of urban streets using dockless shared bike trajectory data

Cycle route uptake and scenario estimation (CRUSE): an approach for developing strategic cycle network planning tools

Bicycle Data-Driven Application Framework: A Dutch Case Study on Machine Learning-Based Bicycle Delay Estimation at Signalized Intersections Using Nationwide Sparse GPS Data