Abstract:BackgroundThere is comprehensive evidence of the positive health effects of physical activity, and transport authorities can enable this by developing infrastructure for cycling and walking. In particular, cycling to work or to school can be a relatively high intensity activity that by itself might suffice for maximum health gain. In this paper, we present estimates of net health effects that can be assumed for demand responses to infrastructure development. The estimation was based on comparing current cyclists/pedestrians against potential cyclists/pedestrians, applying the international physical activity questionnaire, which is a survey-based method for estimating metabolic equivalent task levels from self-reported types of physical activity, and their frequency, duration and level of intensity (moderate or vigorous).. By comparing between shares of individuals with medium or high intensity levels, within the segments of current cyclists/pedestrians and potential cyclists/pedestrians, we estimate the possible net health effects of potential new users of improved cycling/walking infrastructure. For an underpinning of the estimates, we also include the respondents' assessments of the extent to which cycling/walking for transport replaces other physical activity, and we carry out a regression of cycling/walking activity levels on individual characteristics and cycle/walk facility features.ResultsThe estimated share of new regular cyclists obtaining net health gains was ca. 30%, while for new regular pedestrians this was only ca. 15%. These estimates are based on the assumption that the new users of improved cycle/walk facilities are best represented by self-declared potential users of such improved facilities. For potential cyclists/pedestrians, exercise was stated as the main motivation for physical active transport, but among current regular cyclists "fast and flexible" was just as important as exercising. Measured intensity levels from physically active transport increased with separate cycling/walking facilities, and were higher for those with higher education and living in urban areas, while they were lower for those with higher BMI and higher age.ConclusionsSince the share obtaining net health gains might have a huge impact on cost-benefit analysis of new or improved infrastructure for cyclists/pedestrians, it is of importance to estimate this share. A main limitation of our estimation is the cross-sectional design. There is a need for more case studies combining surveys and objective measurement of physical activity changes, preferably before and after the construction of new infrastructure.

Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling

Evaluation of land-use and transport network effects on cyclists' route choices in the Copenhagen Region in value-of-distance space

Riding smooth: A cost-benefit assessment of surface quality on Copenhagen's bicycle network

Riding smooth: A cost-benefit assessment of surface quality on Copenhagen’s bicycle network

Estimating the impact of cycling infrastructure improvements on usage: A spatial difference-in-differences approach

The spatio-temporal development of Copenhagen’s bicycle infrastructure 1912–2013

Cycling and walking for transport: Estimating net health effects from comparison of different transport mode users' self-reported physical activity

Network analysis of the Danish bicycle infrastructure: Bikeability across urban-rural divides

Demand-driven design of bicycle infrastructure networks for improved urban bikeability

The Amenity Value of Bicycle Infrastructure: A Hedonic Application to Greater Manchester, UK

Build it but will they come? Exploring the impact of introducing contraflow cycling on cycling volumes with crowd-sourced data

Quantitative modelling of cyclists' route choice behaviour on utilitarian trips based on GPS data: associated factors and behavioural implications

Cohesive urban bicycle infrastructure design through optimal transport routing in multilayer networks

Urban bicycle tourism: path dependencies and innovation in Greater Copenhagen

Built environment bikeability as a predictor of cycling frequency: Lessons from Barcelona

Evaluating the bikeability of urban streets using dockless shared bike trajectory data

Roles of infrastructure and land use in bicycle crash exposure and frequency: A case study using Greater London bike sharing data

How equitable are the distributions of the physical activity and accessibility benefits of bicycle infrastructure?

Effect of pop-up bike lanes on cycling in European cities

How much behaviour change is required for the investment in cycling infrastructure to be sustainable? A break-even analysis

From Counting Stations to City-Wide Estimates: Data-Driven Bicycle Volume Extrapolation