Abstract:BackgroundThere is comprehensive evidence of the positive health effects of physical activity, and transport authorities can enable this by developing infrastructure for cycling and walking. In particular, cycling to work or to school can be a relatively high intensity activity that by itself might suffice for maximum health gain. In this paper, we present estimates of net health effects that can be assumed for demand responses to infrastructure development. The estimation was based on comparing current cyclists/pedestrians against potential cyclists/pedestrians, applying the international physical activity questionnaire, which is a survey-based method for estimating metabolic equivalent task levels from self-reported types of physical activity, and their frequency, duration and level of intensity (moderate or vigorous).. By comparing between shares of individuals with medium or high intensity levels, within the segments of current cyclists/pedestrians and potential cyclists/pedestrians, we estimate the possible net health effects of potential new users of improved cycling/walking infrastructure. For an underpinning of the estimates, we also include the respondents' assessments of the extent to which cycling/walking for transport replaces other physical activity, and we carry out a regression of cycling/walking activity levels on individual characteristics and cycle/walk facility features.ResultsThe estimated share of new regular cyclists obtaining net health gains was ca. 30%, while for new regular pedestrians this was only ca. 15%. These estimates are based on the assumption that the new users of improved cycle/walk facilities are best represented by self-declared potential users of such improved facilities. For potential cyclists/pedestrians, exercise was stated as the main motivation for physical active transport, but among current regular cyclists "fast and flexible" was just as important as exercising. Measured intensity levels from physically active transport increased with separate cycling/walking facilities, and were higher for those with higher education and living in urban areas, while they were lower for those with higher BMI and higher age.ConclusionsSince the share obtaining net health gains might have a huge impact on cost-benefit analysis of new or improved infrastructure for cyclists/pedestrians, it is of importance to estimate this share. A main limitation of our estimation is the cross-sectional design. There is a need for more case studies combining surveys and objective measurement of physical activity changes, preferably before and after the construction of new infrastructure.

Riding smooth: A cost-benefit assessment of surface quality on Copenhagen's bicycle network

Riding smooth: A cost-benefit assessment of surface quality on Copenhagen’s bicycle network

Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling

A Crowdsensing Approach for Deriving Surface Quality of Cycling Infrastructure

Evaluation of land-use and transport network effects on cyclists' route choices in the Copenhagen Region in value-of-distance space

How Good Is Open Bicycle Network Data? A Countrywide Case Study of Denmark

How Good Is Open Bicycle Infrastructure Data? A Countrywide Case Study of Denmark

Evaluating Bicycle Path Roughness: A Comparative Study Using Smartphone and Smart Bicycle Light Sensors

Network analysis of the Danish bicycle infrastructure: Bikeability across urban-rural divides

How much behaviour change is required for the investment in cycling infrastructure to be sustainable? A break-even analysis

Estimating the impact of cycling infrastructure improvements on usage: A spatial difference-in-differences approach

Evaluating the bikeability of urban streets using dockless shared bike trajectory data

How equitable are the distributions of the physical activity and accessibility benefits of bicycle infrastructure?

A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits

Cycling and walking for transport: Estimating net health effects from comparison of different transport mode users' self-reported physical activity

Taking steps toward healthy & sustainable transport investment: A systematic review of economic evaluations in the academic literature on large-scale active transport infrastructure

A Road Segment Prioritization Approach for Cycling Infrastructure

On cycling risk and discomfort: urban safety mapping and bike route recommendations

Bicycle infrastructure: can good design encourage cycling?

Unpacking the perceived cycling safety of road environment using street view imagery and cycle accident data

Evaluation of large‐scale cycling environment by using the trajectory data of dockless shared bicycles: A data‐driven approach