Abstract:Purpose This paper investigates whether the audit fees of Chinese listed firms are associated with the share pledging practice of the firm’s controlling shareholders. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the audit pricing model to estimate the association between the share pledging of listed firms and audit fees. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted on a large sample of Chinese listed firms during the period 2004 to 2019. The authors further test the moderating effects of listing on the Main Board, state ownership and abnormal audit report lag on the association between share pledging and audit fees. The results remain robust to various endogeneity tests including two-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis, entropy balancing analysis and difference-in-difference analysis. Findings The study finds that audit fees are positively associated with the proportion of shares pledged by the listed firm’s controlling shareholder in China. The results also provide new evidence that the positive association between audit fees and the share pledging of controlling shareholders could be mitigated if the firm is listed on the Main Board and/or it is a state-owned enterprise. In contrast, pledged firms with abnormal audit report lag are found to have higher audit fees than their pledged counterparts without the excessively long audit delay. Practical implications Findings of this study have important practical implications to those charged with governance, as boards need to comprehensively understand the adverse consequences of share pledging when pursuing it as the firm’s major source of financing. The study also has policy implications for stock market regulators such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission in China. Regulators could consider developing a threshold-based share pledging disclosure and pledge ratio requirements based on factors such as a firm’s listing status and ownership structure. Originality/value This study provides new evidence on the audit-related consequences of share pledging in a significant capital market. Findings of this study also enrich the existing audit literature by introducing the share pledging activities of controlling shareholders into the audit pricing decision-making model.

Do auditors value social trust? Evidence from China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Social trust and the demand for audit quality

Social Trust and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Social trust and internal control extensiveness: Evidence from China

Do auditors care about what retail investors say? Evidence from China

Social Trust and Dividend Payouts: Evidence from China

Does social trust affect firms' ESG performance?

Social Trust, Market Competition, and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Contemporary China

Does social media attention influence audit reporting conservatism? Evidence from China

Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from China

Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG information disclosure and audit fees: evidence from non-financial A-share listed companies in China

Restoring Trust among Investors after Shredded CPA Reputation: Evidence from China

Trust and corporate debt maturity mismatch: Evidence from China

Social Trust and Bank Loan Financing: Evidence from China

Do auditors respond when listed firms pledge shares? Evidence from China

ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China

Does social trust restrain excess perk consumption? Evidence from China

Does corporate social responsibility affect auditor-client contracting? Evidence from auditor selection and audit fees

Political connections, auditor choice and corporate accounting transparency: evidence from private sector firms in China