Abstract:Introduction In psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR), rank scales are widely used to assess the severity of functional disorders in patients. The main problem of evaluating the effectiveness of PSR is related to the methods of processing data obtained using psychometric scales used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions within PSR. J. Pfanzagl (1968) obtained the proof of the non-numerical nature of ranks. Incorrect processing of rank information obtained in the framework of psychosocial research leads to contradictions in the assessment of the patient's condition. Consequently, rank processing does not allow classical mathematical operations (summation, average), which makes it impossible to correctly estimate the effectiveness of PSR numerically. Objectives Development of algorithms for numerical evaluation of PSR efficiency based on rank information processing using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1]. Methods Clinical, psychometric, AHP algorithms. Results The analysis of the problems of assessing the patient's conditions on the basis of categorical and psychometric (rank) scales and subscales shows that these problems can be presented in the form of appropriate hierarchies [2], the structure of which must be taken into account when processing the initial information. According to the results of the analysis of the data of preliminary studies, the main areas of impaired functioning of patients affecting the evaluation of the effectiveness of PSR have been identified. Rank estimates of changes in the relevant areas of the patient's dysfunction after the PSR program compared to the initial level are the basis for the conclusion about the effectiveness of the PSR components. Algorithms of the AHP normative approach were used to translate rank information into numerical information [2]. The weight of the areas of the patient's functioning disorders was used in the formation of integral estimates of the effectiveness of PSR. The fundamental difference between AHP-based assessments and rank assessments is due to the fact that numerical estimates of the weight of the criteria and the corresponding changes in the patient's condition are obtained, which depend on the qualifications of specialists, the characteristics of the scales used to measure violations in the relevant areas and the procedures of the PSR. ConclusionsDisclosure of Interest None Declared

The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used

DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition

The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: Applications to decisions under Risk

The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications

On teaching the analytic hierarchy process

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Extensions

Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process

Consistency Indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Review

Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications

Mapping verbal responses to numerical scales in the analytic hierarchy process

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Analytic hierarchy process

Does fuzzification of pairwise comparisons in analytic hierarchy process add any value?

On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means

Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS)

Personalized assessment of the effectiveness of psychosocial rehabilitation: an innovative approach based on the process of analytical hierarchy

Application of analytic hierarchy process in performance appraisal system

Iterative Hierarchy and Ranking Process (IHRP): A Novel Effective Hierarchy Method for Densely Connected Systems and Case Study in Student Performance Assessment

Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with ordered pair of normalized real numbers