Nickel sources affect soil biological properties but do not affect sorghum growth

Suelen Cristina Nunes Alves,Luciana Maria Saran,Teresa Cristina Tarle Pissarra,Wanderley José de Melo,Denise de Lima Dias Delarica,Roberta Souto Carlos,Gabriel Maurício Peruca de Melo,Ademir Sérgio Ferreira Araújo,Liandra Maria Abaker Bertipaglia,Riviane Maria Alburquerque Donha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141722
IF: 8.8
2024-03-21
Chemosphere
Abstract:Nickel (Ni) is an essential element, but it can be phytotoxic in high concentration, which may be caused by high availability in soil solution. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sources and doses of Ni applied to a dystrophic Red Latosol cultivated with sorghum on i) the availability of the metal in the soil; ii) the impact on biological and biochemical properties of the soil; iii) the absorption and distribution in sorghum plants; and iv) crop productivity. The experiment was carried out within a completely randomized design with two nickel sources [nickel(II) nitrate, Ni(NO 3 ) 2 and nickel(III) oxide, Ni 2 O 3 ], three doses (35, 70, and 140 mg Ni kg −1 soil), plus controls without Ni, with 3 replications. The concentrations of Ni in the soil, soil microbial biomass (SMB), basal soil respiration (BSR), metabolic quotient (qCO 2 ), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis, and urease activity were determined. The concentrations of Ni in the leaf diagnostic and in the plant (shoot, root, and grains) were also measured. In the soil, the concentrations of available Ni remained between 0.21 and 54.01 mg Ni kg −1 . Ni 2 O 3 contributed very little to the increase in available Ni. SMB and the FDA hydrolysis were not affected by the Ni source or Ni dose, but BSR and qCO 2 had significant increase with Ni application rates, suggesting the soil microorganisms faced stress. Soil urease activity was affected by Ni dose but not by Ni source. The dose of Ni as Ni(NO 3 ) 2 decreased the metal concentration in the plant, while that of Ni 2 O 3 increased it. Nickel source did not affect dry mass production of the plants, but grain yield was affected in a dose-dependent manner when Ni 2 O 3 was the source of Ni.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?